New England grocery store operators told a Minnesota federal court Wednesday they plan to appeal a July loss in multidistrict litigation accusing Supervalu Inc. of agreeing to not compete for customers with C&S Wholesale Grocers Inc. in the wholesale supply of groceries.
A California state appeals court on Tuesday affirmed an order voiding an agreement staffing company Robert Half International Inc. had cited in seeking to send an ex-worker’s proposed wage class action to solo arbitration, saying the company’s overbroad arbitration pact doomed itself.
A California federal judge on Tuesday refused to resume Global Music Rights LLC's suit alleging that industry group Radio Music License Committee Inc. is operating an "illegal cartel," telling the performance rights organization it should litigate in Pennsylvania, where it was sued first.
The general contractor on a New York City tunnel rehabilitation project on Tuesday dodged claims brought under city, state and federal civil rights laws in a suit alleging it was racially motivated when it scrapped a contract with an African American-owned business.
Book distributor Readerlink Distribution Services LLC got hit with a lawsuit in Illinois federal court Tuesday by a woman who says it is selling a "Star Wars" book that misattributes its shoddy Spanish translation to her and hasn't destroyed the books despite indicating several times it would.
A nearly $4 million breach of contract case over the butterfat content of ice cream sandwiches is in the hands of a Massachusetts federal jury after attorneys on Wednesday argued over whether Mister Cookie Face LLC ruined dessert maker 600 lb. Gorillas Inc.'s business by changing a formula that left customers with an icy taste in their mouths.
Dish Network continues to urge the Seventh Circuit to upend a $280 million judgment won by state and federal regulators over violations of do-not-call laws, arguing in a recent brief that government officials can’t defend a decision “premised on basic legal errors.”
The CEO of Energy Transfer Partners LP has moved to quash a subpoena seeking documents from the company in his personal $20 million fraud suit against Advanced Particle Therapy LLC, saying the material is irrelevant to the case and the subpoena is harassment against the company.
A slew of Tinder founders, early employees and current executives hit the dating app’s parent companies, IAC and Match Group Inc., with a $2 billion suit in New York state court Tuesday, accusing the companies of deliberately tanking the valuation of the dating app in order to lessen the value of their stock options.
A Nevada federal judge on Tuesday ordered Rimini Street Inc. to pay Oracle Corp. $28.5 million in attorneys' fees after years of litigation in their copyright infringement case, saying the award was still justified even though the Ninth Circuit reversed Oracle’s state-law claims.
This global law firm has recently focused on creating opportunities for people with disabilities across its ranks, and its efforts are already showing results.
A New Jersey federal judge ordered an Italian engineering contractor to arbitrate its defamation lawsuit against a U.S. manufacturer of steam condensers, rejecting arguments that the dispute stemming from a power plant project fell outside an underlying arbitration clause.
A California federal judge certified a class of AT&T customers who accused the company of misleading them about overseas roaming fees, finding in the long-running suit that, though the customers had gotten information from different sources, their claims could be heard as a group.
A Maryland federal judge said Tuesday that New York attorney Paul Napoli can’t shut down a suit over unpaid fee arrangements just because most of the work in question was done outside of the Old Line State, finding there’s enough of a connection to exercise jurisdiction.
A Florida federal judge has agreed with Miami-Dade County and the city of Miami that their suit against the Miami Marlins belongs in state court, ruling Tuesday that the dispute over the team’s $1.2 billion sale was removed to federal court prematurely.
A Wisconsin federal judge on Tuesday ruled that the National Labor Relations Board didn't jump the rails of federal labor law when it pursued a retaliation complaint against Menard Inc. on behalf of a contractor, saying the agency acted within its authority and the retailer will be able to appeal an outcome it doesn't like.
A California appeals court said Monday that an attorney didn’t breach the terms of his clients’ wrongful death settlement with Monster Energy Co. by talking to a reporter about the deal, finding that the attorney had merely given his “professional thumbs-up” by signing the contract and he wasn’t a party to it.
At least 1,000 people could be part of a proposed class claiming CertainTeed Corp. made defective asphalt roofing shingles and isn’t fairly compensating some people who have them on their homes, a pair of homeowners told a Washington federal court Monday.
Weyerhaeuser Co. on Monday urged a Minnesota federal court to force a homeowner to arbitrate his claims that defective joists in his home gave off formaldehyde gas, arguing that not doing so would run afoul of a home purchase agreement and create more confusion.
The Fifth Circuit has found that a Mississippi farming and landscaping equipment dealer must go to arbitration to settle a contract dispute with Deere & Co., saying a provision to compel arbitration stands even though the contract providing that provision was terminated.
I clerked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg before the days of RBG bobbleheads and “You Can’t Spell Truth Without Ruth” T-shirts. I had no idea I would become a judge, and I feel lucky every day that I had the chance to learn from her, says California Supreme Court Justice Goodwin Liu.
In this article, David Dorner and Brent Beissel of Reed Smith LLP focus on some noteworthy sales and use tax law changes, cases, rulings and secondary legal guidance, as well as review a newly filed New Jersey corporate income tax case involving transfer pricing adjustments to the payments under an intercompany aircraft lease.
A lot has changed since I clerked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg 20 years ago. At that time, I had hair and no wife. I also thought I knew everything — but working for the justice made me realize very quickly that I actually knew very little, says Ninth Circuit Judge John Owens.
In 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court, and I began my two-year clerkship with her. In her first opinion as a justice, and in dozens since, Justice Ginsburg reminded us how the law needs to operate if equality is to be a reality, says Margo Schlanger, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School.
Courts have generally recognized that online contracts can be enforced like any other agreements, but a June decision from the First Circuit invalidates an arbitration clause in an electronic contract simply because the link provided was in the wrong font and color. This decision fundamentally misunderstands the nature of internet commerce, say attorneys with Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP.
In Lamps Plus v. Varela, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide next term whether an arbitration agreement that says nothing about class arbitration can be interpreted to constitute consent by the parties. But it's currently unclear if the Supreme Court will specify who can actually decide that question, says Gilbert Samberg of Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC.
Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor most state procedure codes expressly address whether, in what circumstances, or how a party may use technology-assisted review to fulfill its disclosure obligations. A new rule introduced last week by the Commercial Division of the New York Supreme Court aims to fill that gap, say Elizabeth Sacksteder and Ross Gotler of Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP.
The world of international litigation and arbitration tends to move slowly — however, I expect the pace of change to accelerate in the coming decade as six trends take hold, says Cedric Chao, U.S. head of DLA Piper's international arbitration practice.
In a time of increased mergers and acquisitions, a health care provider's failure to revisit its payer contracts portfolio can have profound consequences on revenue stream. Keith Anderson of FTI Consulting Inc. discusses why consistent review of all contracts is essential.
The recent emergence of artificial intelligence-based technology has prompted serious concerns about the future integrity of recordings. Attorneys must think critically about standards for authenticating audio and video evidence as well as legislative and regulatory safeguards to discourage pervasive manipulation and forgery, says Jonathan Mraunac of Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC.