A New York federal judge has ordered both sides in a $25 million competition suit against JPMorgan Chase & Co. to refile their motions over what evidence to allow at trial without the “extremely excessive” redactions, saying that by his estimation, up to 90 percent of the redacted information should not have been concealed.
A New Jersey state appeals court on Tuesday revived a sexual harassment and gender discrimination suit against a cybersecurity business brought by a former sales associate, saying an arbitration agreement did not notify her that she was waiving the right to pursue a claim in court or go before a jury.
The Boeing Co. has urged an Alabama federal court to find that Alabama Aircraft Industries can’t pursue lost-profits damages in its suit alleging Boeing cut it out of a $1.3 billion U.S. Air Force deal, while the now-bankrupt AAI argued the parties’ agreement doesn’t bar such recovery.
Three Pennsylvania gas station companies’ briefs were no substitute for post-trial motions when it came to preserving matters for an appeal in a lawsuit over unpaid bills for uniforms and supplies, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled Tuesday.
A company that develops 3D printing processes did not violate a non-disclosure agreement when it included information about a specific polymer in a patent application, because the agreement carved out exactly that scenario, the Seventh Circuit said Monday.
In a move described as atypical, the Federal Circuit on Tuesday partially tossed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision upholding a Paragon BioTeck eye solution patent challenged by Altaire Pharmaceuticals Inc., in light of a settlement reached between the drugmakers.
The City of New York has won a long-running trademark dispute over the iconic Central Park restaurant Tavern on the Green, preventing the landmark’s former operator from continuing to use the name.
New York plaintiffs lawyer Paul Napoli and others connected to a now-defunct firm he co-founded asked a Maryland federal judge to rule against a Baltimore attorney in a dispute over unpaid fees in asbestos cases, saying the fee-splitting agreements she made with the defunct firm are barred by New York ethics rules.
Travelers on Friday asked a New York court to rule it doesn’t have to defend or indemnify Harvey Weinstein in a host of lawsuits alleging the Hollywood mogul sexually harassed or assaulted women, saying Weinstein doesn’t qualify as an insured under 10 policies issued to The Walt Disney Co. and that even if he did, multiple exclusions would bar coverage.
Qualcomm has urged a California federal judge to reject Apple’s efforts to pare back counterclaims in a sprawling contract and competition dispute over the chipmaker's patent licensing tactics, blasting Apple for bringing accusations of shirked patent-licensing obligations only to claim Qualcomm cannot pursue the reverse.
Prosecutors seeking to convict a physician from Hong Kong of bribing African officials for favors in the energy and banking sectors said Friday he remains a flight risk and should stay jailed, after the quiet dismissal of his co-defendant ahead of a Nov. 5 trial caused a Manhattan judge to agree to revisit the question of bail.
A former co-owner of the landmark Philadelphia luxury retailer Boyds is accusing his brother-in-law and former business partner of reneging on a $7 million contract governing his retirement from the company following a fight outside a popular cheesesteak stand.
Domino's Pizza Inc. won’t have to face claims that it flouted federal and state labor laws by allowing franchisees to short employees on wages, after a New York federal judge ruled that the company wasn’t a joint employer to the workers.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday chose not to hear a California broadcaster’s decadeslong challenge to block a license transfer, leaving in place a D.C. Circuit decision that upholds a sales agreement between the broadcaster and Entercom.
A former LeClairRyan attorney urged a Virginia federal court Monday to confirm an arbitration award for just more than $1 million in damages and attorneys' fees and costs in her gender discrimination lawsuit.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review a 2017 Texas Supreme Court ruling saying Noble Energy Inc. must indemnify ConocoPhillips Co. for $63 million in environmental cleanup costs.
A Florida federal judge has dismissed a proposed class action alleging Dollar Rent A Car deceived consumers regarding an “administrative fee” for each electronic road toll incurred by drivers who opt not to buy a toll package at the start of their contract.
The show will go on for several small cinemas that accuse a national theater chain of monopolizing independent films and strangling their business, but the chain's corporate owner will get out of the case, a D.C. federal judge ruled Friday.
Los Angeles Rams owner Stan Kroenke's entertainment holding company has moved to shut down a suit brought by the former president of two aerial camera companies Kroenke bought, telling a Texas federal court the plaintiff stole documents to support his suit before he was fired.
Pharmaceutical company Fresenius Kabi AG can walk away from its proposed $4.3 billion acquisition of Akorn Inc., a Delaware Chancery judge determined Monday, saying regulatory compliance issues at Akorn triggered the buyer's rights to terminate the merger.
In this time of partisan conflict over judicial selection, a new book by Canadian jurist Robert J. Sharpe — "Good Judgment" — represents a refreshing, deeply thoughtful departure from binary arguments about how and why judges make decisions, says U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel, director of the Federal Judicial Center.
E-discovery is not easy, but employing these 10 strategies may help minimize future headaches, say Debbie Reynolds and Daryl Gardner of EimerStahl Discovery Solutions LLC.
Many eyes are on the Delaware Chancery Court to see whether it will compel Fresenius to close on a $4.5 billion acquisition of Akorn. The case, which completed post-trial briefing last week, presents an interesting question about the meaning of stock price as evidence in litigation, say Alexander Berger, an investment consultant, and J.B. Heaton, a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School.
In the past few years, landlords, investors and developers have shown increased interest in triple-net ground leases of peripheral properties surrounding retail centers. However, they should consider the issues that can pop up when a ground leased parcel is part of a larger commercial development, says Andrew Hodgson of Husch Blackwell LLP.
Many limited liability companies are formed in Delaware because of the state’s well-developed and business-friendly law in this area. But a recent decision in Wenske v. Blue Bell Creameries highlights the level of care with which an LLC's governing agreement must be drafted in order to maximize these ostensible advantages, says Adrienne B. Koch of Katsky Korins LLP.
A well-drafted partnership agreement protects a law firm's founders, establishes a process for new and outgoing partners, and sets forth guidelines for navigating conflict along the way. Startup firms can begin with something less complex, but there are important elements that every agreement should include, says Russell Shinsky of Anchin Block & Anchin LLP.
Forget about cameras, reporters in the Manafort trial were not even permitted in the courtroom with their phones, tablets or computers. That meant no live reporting on Twitter and no emails to the newsrooms with updates. In a world focused on information and news as it happens, this is unacceptable, says trial attorney David Oscar Markus.
The question as to when a person is receiving a share of partnership income or compensation continues to be a vexing issue. It is valuable to consider the U.S. Tax Court's recent holding in White v. Commissioner in the context of the relatively developed body of law to see how private funds can better structure carried interests and management fee waivers, say Mark Leeds and Guoyu Tao of Mayer Brown LLP.
The CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion Pledge is an initiative designed to promote diversity in the workplace. However, because its three main elements are extremely broad, the lack of specificity about what a company is committing to could be problematic in a litigation context, say Anthony Oncidi and Seth Victor of Proskauer Rose LLP.
The Eastern District of Virginia is poised to render a decision in Steves & Sons v. Jeld-Wen that may run into the U.S. Supreme Court’s concerns regarding belated challenges to mergers, as well as potentially create uncertainty in the value of pre-merger clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, say Derek Dahlgren and Spencer Johnson of Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck PC.