Order | Filed: July 20, 2026
| Entered: July 20, 2026
Olali v. Ampex Brands Limited Liability Corporation
Civil Rights: Employment | Texas Northern
Order Order Vacating ~Util - Case Reopened
ORDER: Before the Court are Plaintiff Shawn Olali's Motion for New Trial and to Alter and Amend the Judgment With Incorporated Brief in Support (the "Motion") (Doc. No. 47), Defendant Ampex Brands LLC's Response to Plaintiff's Motion (the "Response") (Doc. No. 48), and Plaintiffs Reply With Incorporated Brief to Defendant (the "Reply") (Doc. No. 49). The Court has carefully considered the Motion, the Response, and the Reply, as well as the applicable law and the relevant portions of the record. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion.
Accordingly, the Court CORRECTS its Order Accepting FCR, docketed on February 23, 2026, as follows:
United States Magistrate Judge Rene Harris Toliver made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. Objections were filed, and the Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, Defendant Ampex Brands LLC's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's discriminatory hiring and promotion practices claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Additionally, the Court sua sponte VACATES the Judgment (Doc. No. 41) entered in this case.
In light of the Court's vacating of the Judgment entered in this case, Plaintiff's request for the same is DENIED AS MOOT. Further, any remaining requests for relief in Plaintiff's Motion are DENIED.
Finally, the Court again reminds Plaintiff that any use of generative AI must be disclosed on the first page of any document filed with the Court under Local Civil Rule 7.2(f). See L. CIV. R. 7.2(f). Moving forward, if Plaintiff makes use of generative AI in drafting any brief or other filing made in this case, he must also disclose the specific portions in which he utilized generative AI. Any future instances of undisclosed AI use or citations to non-existent case law WILL result in sanctions.
This case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Rene Harris Toliver for pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 7/20/2026) (chmb)