Case Activity (912)

1. Response | Filed: July 06, 2026 | Entered: July 06, 2026 Aerosonic LLC v. Joby Aviation, Inc. et al

   Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | Florida Middle

   Response in Opposition to Motion

   RESPONSE in Opposition re 337 SEALED MOTION to Strike Untimely Expert Opinions filed by Aerosonic LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Stevenson, Allison)

2. Order | Filed: July 06, 2026 | Entered: July 06, 2026 Aerosonic LLC v. Joby Aviation, Inc. et al

   Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | Florida Middle

   Sealed Order on Motion to Seal

   ENDORSED ORDER granting the parties' sealed motions to file responses and exhibits to the various Daubert and summary judgment motions under seal. (Doc. ## 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 380). The right of public access "may be overcome by a showing of good cause." Romero v. Drummond Co., 480 F.3d 1234, 1245 (11th Cir. 2007); see also Chicago Trib. Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1312 (11th Cir. 2001) ("The common-law right of access standard as it applies to particular documents requires the court to balance the competing interests of the parties."). The parties have established good cause for the limited sealing of these documents because they contain confidential or proprietary information. The parties must file the responses and specified exhibits under seal as separate docket entries. The Court orders these items remain sealed until 90 days after the case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To maximize public access, the parties must also file on the public docket redacted versions of the responses and exhibits, which redact the confidential and trade secret information, within 7 days. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/6/2026. (DMD)

3. 910 additional result(s)