Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
China Construction Bank
-
Misc | Filed: June 26, 2023 | Entered: June 26, 2023 In Re: China Construction Bank (Asia) Corporation Limited
| New York Southern
Notice of Filing Transcript
NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a CONFERENCE proceeding held on 6/8/2023 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days....(McGuirk, Kelly)
-
Misc | Filed: June 26, 2023 | Entered: June 26, 2023 In Re: China Construction Bank (Asia) Corporation Limited
| New York Southern
Transcript
TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: CONFERENCE held on 6/8/2023 before Judge Jesse M. Furman. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Doug Colavito, (212) 805-0320. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/17/2023. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/27/2023. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/25/2023..(McGuirk, Kelly)
-
Order | Filed: June 15, 2023 | Entered: June 15, 2023 In Re: China Construction Bank (Asia) Corporation Limited
| New York Southern
Protective Order
STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... This stipulation binds the parties to treat as confidential the documents so classified. This Court, however, has not reviewed the documents referenced herein; therefore, by so ordering this stipulation, the Court makes no finding as to whether the documents are confidential. To the extent that the parties seek to file any of the material designated as confidential in this Court, that finding will be made, if ever, upon a document-by-document review pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Court's Individual Rules and Practices and subject to the presumption in favor of public access to "judicial documents." See generally Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). To that end, the Court does not "so order" any provision to the extent that it purports to authorize the parties to file documents under seal without a prior court order. See New York ex rel. Khurana v. Spherion Corp., No. 15-CV-6605 (JMF), 2019 WL 3294170 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2019). (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/15/2023) (ate)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login