Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Federated Mutual Insurance Co.
-
Response | Filed: April 29, 2024 | Entered: April 29, 2024 Federated Life Insurance Company v. Joanis et al
Insurance | Washington Western
Declaration
DECLARATION of Kyro Lantsberger filed by Plaintiff Federated Life Insurance Company re 25 MOTION for Judgment in Interpleader (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sekits, Matthew)
-
Motion | Filed: April 29, 2024 | Entered: April 29, 2024 Federated Life Insurance Company v. Joanis et al
Insurance | Washington Western
Judgment
MOTION for Judgment in Interpleader, filed by Plaintiff Federated Life Insurance Company. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/28/2024, (Sekits, Matthew)
-
Filed: April 29, 2024 | Entered: April 29, 2024 JLD Automotive Services Inc v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
110(Contract: Insurance) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court denies Defendant's motion for leave to amend 61 without prejudice because Defendant has failed to clearly indicate in the motion whether the motion is opposed or unopposed. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, "[b]efore filing a motion, the movant's counsel must ask opposing counsel whether there is an objection to the motion. The motion should clearly indicate whether it is opposed or unopposed." By 5/3/2024, Defendant may file another motion for leave to amend, and in that motion Defendant must clearly indicate whether the motion is opposed or unopposed. Additionally, from the Court's review of the docket, it does not appear that a deadline for amendment of pleadings has been set. Defendant's renewed motion should indicate whether a deadline has been set, and if so, whether it has expired, as that impacts the standard under which a motion for leave to amend is considered. See Adams v. City of Indianapolis, 742 F.3d 720, 734 (7th Cir. 2014) (quoting Alioto v. Town of Lisbon, 651 F.3d 715, 719 (7th Cir. 2011)) ("[W]hen a motion for leave to amend is filed after the deadline for amending the pleadings has elapsed... the district court 'is entitled to apply the heightened good-cause standard of Rule 16(b)(4) before considering whether the requires of Rule 15(a)(2) were satisfied.'"). Finally, the Court notes that Defendant's motion for leave to amend 61 was incorrectly marked for presentment to the Magistrate Judge when it should have been marked for presentment before the District Judge. See R. 60 . Defendant is reminded to notice the motions to be presented before the correct Judge when filing motions. (ca, ) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login