Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Freightliner LLC
-
Stipulation | Filed: November 08, 2021 | Entered: November 08, 2021 Juan Tobar v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company et al
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability | California Central
Dismiss Case
STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) - (With Prejudice) filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Latiolait, Anthony)
-
Order | Filed: October 26, 2021 | Entered: October 26, 2021 Juan Tobar v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company et al
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability | California Central
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held ~Util - Terminate Deadlines and Hearings ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On July 28, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement. Accordingly, the Court ordered the parties to file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 by September 23, 2021. The Court then issued an Order granting the parties' stipulated request to extend the dismissal deadline to October 25, 2021. The parties again moved to extend the dismissal deadline 58 , but the Court denied that motion 59 . To date, the parties have failed to file a timely dismissal. The Court reiterates that it has no interest in monitoring parties compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement. Because the parties have settled the matter, this case should be dismissed. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case and vacate all dates and deadlines. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
-
Order | Filed: October 25, 2021 | Entered: October 25, 2021 Juan Tobar v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company et al
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability | California Central
Extension of Time to File
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On October 22, 2021, the parties submitted a Motion again requesting an extension of thedeadline to file dismissal 58 . The parties assert that an extension is necessary because they are "still awaiting executed Medicare documents" and "settlement funds." The Court has no interest in monitoring parties compliance with the terms of a settlement agreement. Given that the parties have settled the matter, this case should be dismissed. Any failure to satisfy the terms of the parties' settlement agreement, including payment, should be enforced in a subsequent lawsuit. The Motion is therefore DENIED. (lc)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login