Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Mannatech, Incorporated
-
Order | Filed: January 20, 2022 | Entered: January 20, 2022 Calcano v. Mannatech, Incorporated
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other | New York Southern
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal - Signed
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: Plaintiff(s), EVELINA CALCANO, in accordance with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses the above entitled action against Defendant, MANNATECH, INCORPORATED, with prejudice and without fees and costs. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/20/2022) (ate)
-
Notice | Filed: January 19, 2022 | Entered: January 19, 2022 Calcano v. Mannatech, Incorporated
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other | New York Southern
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Mannatech, Incorporated. Document filed by Evelina Calcano. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(LaBollita, Michael)
-
Order | Filed: November 29, 2021 Calcano v. Mannatech, Incorporated
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other | New York Southern
Order
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines are CANCELLED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs (including attorneys' fees) to either party. The Cler k of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions and to CLOSE the case. Within 30 days of this order, the parties may apply to reopen this case. Any such application must show good cause for holding the case open in light of the p arties' settlement and must be filed within 30 days. Any request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied solely on that basis. Additionally, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce thei r settlement agreement, they must submit within the same 30-day period: (1) their settlement agreement to the Court in accordance with Rule 6.A of the Courts Individual Practices and (2) a request that the Court issue an order expressly retaining j urisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354 (2d Cir. 2015). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the case caption by deleting the language "individ ually and on behalf of all others similarly situated" after the individual Plaintiff's name. Because the parties did not notify the Court that they intended to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e), this dismissal and any settlement between the parties is operative only as between the individual Plaintiff and Defendant and does not bind any absent putative class members. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 11/29/2021) (tg)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login