Civil Rights: Other | New York Eastern

Judgment - Clerk

JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed as set forth in the Court's September 23, 2022 Memorandum and Order; that Plaintif's motion for reconsideration is denied; that Cheryl D. Uzamere is ENJOINED from filing any new action (whether fee paid or requesting in forma pauperis status) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York without first obtaining permission from the Court; that in order to seek permission, Cheryl D. Uzamere must include the proposed complaint AND a separate letter explaining the basis for requesting permission to file. If Cheryl D. Uzamere fails to include a separate request for leave to file, the Clerk of Court is directed to RETURN the submission without filing; no action will be taken. To eliminate the need to write a decision every time Cheryl D. Uzamere makes a frivolous filing (as that would largely defeat the purpose of the injunction), the injunction shall be further implemented as follows (See attached for details). Signed by Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court by J. Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 12/16/2022. (c/m w-appeal packet to pro se Cheryl D. Uzamere at the listed address on the docket sheet). (ML)

Civil Rights: Other | New York Eastern

Memorandum & Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED as set forth in the Court's September 23, 2022 Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close this action. Furthermore, Cheryl D. Uzamere is ENJOINED from filing any new action (whether fee paid or requesting in forma pauperis status) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York without first obtaining permission from the Court. In order to seek permission, Cheryl D. Uzamere must include the proposed complaint AND a separate letter explaining the basis for requesting permission to file. If Cheryl D. Uzamere fails to include a separate request for leave to file, the Clerk of Court is directed to RETURN the submission without filing; no action will be taken. To eliminate the need to write a decision every time Cheryl D. Uzamere makes a frivolous filing (as that would largely defeat the purpose of the injunction), the injunction shall be further implemented as follows: (1) the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to open a miscellaneous case titled In re Cheryl D. Uzamere and file a copy of this Order under that miscellaneous docket number; (2) any action requesting permission to file by Cheryl D. Uzamere shall be filed under the miscellaneous docket number; (3) the Court will review the filing and if it determines that the proposed complaint should not proceed, no further action will be taken; and (4) if the Court determines that the proposed complaint should proceed, the Court will grant permission to file and direct the Clerk of Court to open a new civil matter in which the complaint and leave application will be filed and Cheryl D. Uzamere will be notified by the Clerk of Court to pay the filing fee or request in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff is prohibited from directly contacting any judicial chambers by telephone, electronic mail, fax, or other means. Plaintiff is also prohibited from contacting Court staff outside of the Courthouse (such as by the use of judicial employees' personal phones, personal addresses or electronic mails, or personal social media accounts) for any matter related to any case filed in this Court. Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit Plaintiff from filing an appeal of this Order. Although Plaintiff paid the filing fee to commence this action, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 12/15/2022. (EW)

Civil Rights: Other | New York Eastern

Order on Motion to Compel Order on Motion for Recusal Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

Plaintiff's 21 motion for recusal is DENIED and all other pending motions, ECF Nos. 4 , 25 , are DENIED as moot. See Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall's 30 Memorandum and Order issued on 9/23/2022. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)