Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Pekin Insurance Co x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
365(Personal Inj. Prod. Liability) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motion by Plaintiffs Katherine Evans et al. to join Plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company's response to the motion to strike (Dckt. No. 134 ) is hereby granted. The motion by Plaintiffs Katherine Evans et al. to join Plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company's motion to amend the schedule (Dckt. No. 135 ) is hereby granted. The motion by Plaintiffs Scott Evans et al. to join Plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company's motion to amend the schedule (Dckt. No. 136 ) is hereby granted. The motion by Plaintiffs Scott Evans et al. to join Plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company's response to the motion to strike (Dckt. No. 137 ) is hereby granted. Plaintiffs Scott Evans et al.'s motion to join Plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company's response to Defendant's joint motion about experts Buc and Starr (Dckt. No. 161 ) is hereby granted. Plaintiffs Katherine Evans et al.'s motion to join Plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company's response to Defendant's joint motion about experts Buc and Starr (Dckt. No. 162 ) is hereby granted. Plaintiffs Katherine Evans et al.'s motion to join Plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company's response in opposition to Defendant's joint motion about experts Buc and Starr (Dckt. No. 163 ) is hereby granted. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 06/29/2026)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiffs' team just file one, two, three, four, five, six, seven motions to join other motions. Going forward, that can't happen. It's the legal equivalent of having a cluster bomb go off on the docket. It makes everything hard to follow on the docket, because substantive filings get buried under an avalanche of motions to join join join join join join join. There has to be a better way. The Court directs counsel to meet and confer, talk it over, and figure out something better. Maybe the parties on each side of the "v" must confer with each other before filing any motion, to see if anyone wants to join on the front end. It consumes too many judicial resources to require this Court to enter an order and resolve a motion after someone later decides that they want to "me too" a motion. Setting things on fire - like fireworks, charcoal, and fossil fuels - might be an All-American activity. But the judiciary lacks time to burn. The Court thanks counsel in advance for their anticipated cooperation. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 06/29/2026)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.