Case Activity (51)

1. Order | Filed: January 15, 2026 | Entered: January 15, 2026 Johnson v. Higuerey et al

   Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | Puerto Rico

   Order

   ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 Complaint. District Court judges, in an exercise of the inherent authority to regulate their dockets, may dismiss a case sua sponte, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See Garcia-Perez v. Hosp. Metropolitano, 597 F.3d 6, 7 (1st Cir. 2010); Malot v. Dorado Beach Cottages Assocs., 478 F.3d 40, 43 (1st Cir. 2007). The First Circuit has held that "a party's disregard of a court order is a paradigmatic example of extreme misconduct" which may warrant dismissal. Torres-Vargas v. Pereira, 431 F.3d 389, 393 (1st Cir. 2005). When a "court appropriately forewarns a plaintiff of the consequences of future noncompliance with an unambiguous order, the court need not exhaust less toxic sanctions before dismissing a case [.]" Id. Here, on October 10, 2025, the Court warned Plaintiff at Docket No. 37 that they were noncompliant with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to the steps they've taken to remain in compliance. To date, more than three months after the order, Plaintiff failed to respond, flouting both this Court's orders and Rule 4(m)'s requirements. Thus, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's claims for failure to comply with Rule 4(m) and for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Judgment shall be entered accordingly.Signed by Judge Gina R. Mendez-Miro on 1/15/2026.(GMN)

2. Order | Filed: January 15, 2026 | Entered: January 15, 2026 Johnson v. Higuerey et al

   Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | Puerto Rico

   Judgment

   Judgment. Pursuant to the Order entered at Docket No. 38, Judgment is hereby entered dismissing this case without prejudice.Signed by Judge Gina R. Mendez-Miro on 1/15/2026.(GMN)

3. 49 additional result(s)