Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Order | Filed: October 27, 2021 | Entered: October 27, 2021 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Patent | Delaware
ORAL ORDER re 477 Letter: On or before close of business on October 28, 2021, Plaintiff shall file a letter of no more than two (2) pages in response to Defendant's letter at D.I. 477. Ordered by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 10/27/2021. (lih)
Misc | Filed: October 27, 2021 | Entered: October 27, 2021 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Patent | Delaware
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Sherry R. Fallon from Philip A. Rovner regarding Improper Deposition Objections. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-B)(Rovner, Philip)
Order | Filed: October 26, 2021 | Entered: October 26, 2021 Enriquez v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
Personal Property: Other | California Eastern
Minute Order ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/26/2021: (Text Only Entry) Currently pending before the Court are two motions, a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant that is fully briefed and has a hearing date of November 1, 2021, and a motion to remand filed by Plaintiff that has a hearing date of March 10, 2022. In these situations, it is the Court's practice to resolve a motion to remand before resolving a motion to dismiss. The Court will follow that practice here. However, the Court finds that it is necessary to move the March 10, 2022 hearing date and alter the briefing schedule on the motion to remand in order to more timely resolve the pending motions. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the November 1, 2021 hearing date on Defendant's motion to dismiss is VACATED; (2) the March 10, 2022, hearing date on Plaintiff's motion to remand is VACATED; (3) Defendants shall file an opposition to the motion to remand no later than November 8, 2021, and Plaintiff shall file a reply to the opposition no later than November 15, 2021; (4) upon receipt of the opposition and reply, if the Court determines that a hearing is necessary on the motion to remand, the Court will issue an order setting a new hearing date, otherwise the matter will be resolved on the papers without a hearing; (5) Defendant's motion to dismiss shall be held in abeyance pending resolution of Plaintiff's motion to remand; and (6) upon resolution of Plaintiff's motion to remand, the Court will make further appropriate orders to resolve Defendant's motion to dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Gonzales, V)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS