Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Copyright | New York Southern
Stipulation and Order
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: COPYRIGHT REGISTRATIONS The Parties, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate to the following: 1. The U.S. Copyright Office, which is part of the Library of Congress, maintains a Public Records collection of copyright registration records held by the Copyright Office, available in a searchable online database. A registration record downloaded or printed from such database shall be referred to as Registration Record. Examples of a Registration Record are attached as Exhibits A, B, C, and D hereto. 2. A Registration Record shall have the same legal and evidentiary value as the registration certificate for that copyright registration. 3. The foregoing stipulation does not preclude Defendant from contending that Plaintiffs do not own copyrights in the works underlying their claim and/or such works are not protected by valid, timely, and subsisting copyright registrations. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/15/2026) (rro)
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM OF CONTRIBUTORY COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT: Plaintiffs Advance Local Media LLC; Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. d/b/a Conde Nast; The Atlantic Monthly Group LLC; Forbes Media LLC; Guardian News & Media Limited; Insider, Inc.; Los Angeles Times Communications LLC; The McClatchy Company, LLC; Newsday, LLC Plain Dealer Publishing Co.; Politico LLC; The Republican Company; Toronto Star Newspapers Limited; and Vox Media, LLC (collectively "Publishers'') and Defendant Cohere Inc. ("Cohere"), by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate as set forth below. I. In light of Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, 607 U.S._ (2026), Plaintiffs are no longer pursuing a theory of contributory infringement based on knowledge and material contribution, and thus agree to withdraw this theory of contributory liability with prejudice, but Plaintiffs' claim of contributory infringement based on inducement remains in this case. 2. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this stipulation has any impact on any factual allegations or on the other claims Plaintiffs have asserted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 7/9/2026) (ar)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.