Case Activity (22638)

1. Filed: July 30, 2026 | Entered: July 30, 2026 GrubHub Holdings Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al

   410 Anti-Trust | Illinois Northern

   Minute

   MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Video status and motion hearing held on Plaintiff GrubHub's motion to file additional counsel appearance, R 277. Counsel for the parties appeared by video. (1.) Because of the need to inquire into the attorney-client relationship, the Court held an ex parte and under seal hearing with Plaintiff GrubHub's counsel from the Vorys law firm and the proposed incoming counsel from Jenner & Block. The Court will post an under-seal, ex parte entry summarizing that discussion. On the public record, the Court found that the meet-and-confer requirement had been violated at the fault of Jenner & Block and Plaintiff GrubHub. (2.) As discussed during the ex parte and under seal hearing, the motion to file additional counsel appearances 227 is granted provisionally. If the defense wishes to challenge the newly retained counsel's appearance, then the Defendants shall confer with the Plaintiffs and then file the appropriate motion as soon as practicable. The Court will post an ex parte and under seal entry summarizing the ex parte session. (3.) The filing at R. 226 is a duplicate filing of R. 227. What was intended as Attorney Litvack's motion to appear pro hac vice 226 is terminated as moot, because counsel is already a member of the District Court's General Bar. (4.) As further stated on the record, during the trial, the Plaintiffs will only be allowed one attorney examiner per witness, rather than multiple as generally allowed in Judge Chang's standing Case Management Procedures (under Experience for Newer Attorneys). The GrubHub trial-team relationship has become dysfunctional and the miscommunications (and outright instruction to file a motion without having met-and-conferred) must cease. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

2. Filed: July 30, 2026 | Entered: July 30, 2026 J.L. v. Mindgeek s.a.r.l. et al

   Other Statutory Actions | California Central

   Generic Text Only Entry

   TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE AMENDED CIVIL CASE STANDING ORDER by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: Effective July 23, 2026, the Court has amended its Standing Order for Newly Assigned Civil Cases to include additional provisions governing AI usage, class action settlements and Mandatory Chambers Copies. The amended Standing Order applies to all cases pending before this Court as of July 23, 2026. Accordingly, all parties are ORDERED to review the amendments and ensure compliance moving forward. Parties may refer to the redline version of the Standing Order to identify the specific revisions implemented at https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/Jps/honorable-wesley-l-hsu. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY

3. 22636 additional result(s)