Residents accusing Charter Communications Inc. of making unwanted telemarketing calls with an autodialer have urged a West Virginia federal judge to keep their proposed class action alive, saying the court has jurisdiction even though Charter denies doing business in the state.
A California federal judge on Wednesday tossed a proposed class action alleging that fixes for the security bugs known as Spectre and Meltdown slowed down the processing speed of Apple devices, finding that the consumers behind the suit lacked standing.
A Texas attorney accused by Edelson PC of using the class action objection process to extort class counsel must turn over information about his work in Illinois, including how he settles objections and how he gets paid, a federal judge ruled Thursday.
General Motors was hit with a proposed class action in California federal court Wednesday by drivers alleging that some of the company's diesel trucks are “ticking time bombs” because their European-made injection pumps are incompatible with American fuel.
A Washington federal court has confirmed an Amazon unit's arbitration award that prohibits a British man and his book publishing companies from artificially inflating author royalties under the Kindle self-publishing program.
A Wisconsin federal judge has denied class certification to in-state buyers of Monsanto Co.’s Roundup weed killers who claim the labels misled them about their safety, saying a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision requires each individual plaintiff to show they lost money under the state's false advertising law.
The attorneys general for 16 states and the District of Columbia announced Thursday that they are appealing a controversial Texas federal court ruling last month that struck down the entire Affordable Care Act.
The Federal Trade Commission is pushing a California federal judge to put on hold a dispute set to go to trial later this month over D-Link System Inc.’s allegedly shoddy data security, arguing that its attorneys’ prep work and travel plans have been stymied by the government shutdown.
The American Cable Association attacked Nexstar Media Group on Wednesday for pulling TV channels from cable operators in 16 markets due to an impasse over retransmission fees charged by the broadcast giant to carry its stations' content.
A driver has sued General Motors LLC and a Chicago-based auto dealership in Illinois state court, saying they sold a Buick with a defective ignition switch that caused him to crash and suffer injuries after the vehicle's airbags failed to deploy.
Two appeals filed by the NFL in its landmark concussion settlement have the potential to upend the program and make it drastically more difficult for brain-damaged former players to get paid, according to experts and irate player attorneys, who say in one nonpublic filing that the situation represents “the NFL at its most cynical.”
Wells Fargo & Co. has agreed to pay up to $10 million to resolve the California Department of Insurance's allegations that it signed up consumers for renters and life insurance without their permission, the regulator announced Wednesday.
Twitter, Facebook and Google can’t be held responsible for a December 2015 terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California, because those harmed in the incident can’t show the tech companies actually aided the attackers, a California federal judge has said.
An Illinois federal judge has granted Google a win in a proposed class action from Google Photos users who accused the tech giant of violating the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act by creating templates of their faces, finding they had not suffered a concrete injury that would give them standing.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai claimed victory Wednesday over an attempt to overturn his net neutrality deregulation using the Congressional Review Act mechanism, which officially expires Thursday with the advent of the new Congress.
The former chief executive of Insys Therapeutics has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and mail fraud for his role in a scheme to bribe doctors to prescribe the company's fentanyl-based painkillers, prosecutors said in a court filing.
On the horizon for the financial services industry in the new year are cases that will turn up the heat on the debate over the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s constitutionality, test the legality of the much-vaunted fintech banking charter and potentially increase the number of lawsuits from homeowners fighting foreclosure. Here, Law360 examines the cases that experts most often singled out for their potential impact on the industry.
Cybersecurity and privacy will continue to remain top-of-mind for companies in 2019, with the cyberthreat landscape expected to keep growing, vendor relationships taking on added importance, U.S. states continuing to flex their muscles and international data transfers getting even stickier. Here, attorneys offer five predictions for what promises to be another big year in the cybersecurity and privacy realm.
From bouts between familiar foes, such as Johnson & Johnson and consumers of its talcum powder products, to cases of a more unusual nature, like an attorney's alleged murder at the hands of his former courtroom opponent, legal spectators will have plenty of major trials to watch in the coming year. Here, Law360 offers a preview of some of the interesting and important trials scheduled for 2019.
With Ireland's privacy watchdog probing claims that Facebook and Google have breached Europe's new data protection rules and Illinois's Supreme Court considering a game-changing test of the state's unique biometric privacy law, 2019 is shaping up to be a big year for privacy and cybersecurity litigation. Here are some cases worth tracking, and why.
Attorneys at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Perkins Coie LLP and the Healthcare Association of New York State reflect on lessons they learned the hard way when transitioning to in-house counsel positions.
The Illinois Legislature was at the forefront of protecting biometric information from unauthorized disclosure. A decade later, the exact scope of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act is about to be decided by the state high court in Rosenbach v. Six Flags, says Richard Darke of Duane Morris LLP.
The virtual law team was created as a necessary response to mass tort litigation — however, with advances in technology and ever-increasing specialization of the legal practice, the model should be considered in multiplaintiff litigation of any size, say attorneys at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
The sixth hearing in the Federal Trade Commission’s series on competition in the 21st century addressed the intersection of big data, privacy and antitrust issues. Attorneys with Perkins Coie LLP offer some key takeaways.
Attorneys drafting asymmetric arbitration and jurisdiction provisions, particularly for consumer and employment contracts, must ensure that these provisions are valid in the jurisdictions where all parties are located, not only in the jurisdiction chosen by the contract, say Bruce Paulsen and Jeffrey Dine of Seward & Kissel LLP.
Depending on the U.S. Supreme Court’s eventual decision in PDR Network v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic — a case involving junk faxes under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act — the outcome could have a profound impact on TCPA litigation nationwide, say David Gettings and Alan Wingfield of Troutman Sanders LLP.
Predicting how the cybersecurity landscape will develop is critical for any organization wanting to mitigate the risk of the inevitable future attack. Michael Hall of HighQ Solutions Ltd. discusses five threats to look out for in the next 12 months.
Class actions are often touted as a powerful mechanism for access to justice, but is this true when there is zero chance of recovery for class members? asks Mary Massaron, a partner at Plunkett Cooney PC and former president of Lawyers for Civil Justice.
Joshua Peck, incoming marketing director of Hill Wallack LLP, traces the evolution of the chief marketing officer position at law firms and shares insights from three legal marketing pioneers.
Opposition to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's newly proposed trial disclosure policy appears rooted in a wholly appropriate concern, but the relevant statute and empirical evidence indicate that consumers would benefit from the policy, say Eric Mogilnicki and Michael Nonaka of Covington & Burling LLP.