Expert Analysis

• Challenging Standing In Antitrust Class Actions: Rule 23

  

  A recent Sixth Circuit decision in Fox v. Saginaw County that rejected the common attempt to use Rule 23 to sidestep Article III's standing limitations shows antitrust defendants' success in challenging standing will rest on happenstance without more clarity from the Supreme Court — which no litigant should be comfortable with, say Michael Hamburger and Holly Tao at White & Case.

• Post-Siegel Trustee Fee Rulings Further Debtor-Friendly Trend

  

  One year after the U.S. Supreme Court’s bankruptcy ruling in Siegel v. Fitzgerald left the matter of trustee fee refunds open to lower courts, related rulings have sided with debtors, reminding practitioners of the importance of the constitutional backdrop to statutory law, say Daniel Lowenthal and Jonah Wacholder at Patterson Belknap.

• Firm Tips For Helping New Lawyers Succeed Post-Pandemic

  

  Ten steps can help firms significantly enhance the experience of attorneys who started their careers in the coronavirus pandemic era, including facilitating opportunities for cross-firm connection, which can ultimately help build momentum for business development, says Lana Manganiello at Equinox Strategy Partners.

• Prepping Your Business Ahead Of Affirmative Action Ruling

  

  The U.S. Supreme Court's upcoming ruling on whether race should play a role in college admissions could potentially end affirmative action, and companies will need a considered approach to these circumstances that protects their brand power and future profits, and be prepared to answer tough questions, say Nadine Blackburn at United Minds and Eric Blankenbaker at Weber Shandwick.

• Key Takeaways From Del. Chancery's Oracle Toss

  

  The Delaware Chancery Court's recent finding that Oracle founder Larry Ellison didn't try to influence the company to overpay for its NetSuite acquisition offers important lessons on the determination of issues of control, including the importance of establishing an independent special committee, say attorneys at Fried Frank.

• Tackling Judge-Shopping Concerns While Honoring Localism

  

  As the debate continues over judge-shopping and case assignments in federal court, policymakers should look to a hybrid model that preserves the benefits of localism for those cases that warrant it, while preventing the appearance of judge-shopping for cases of a more national or widespread character, says Joshua Sohn at the U.S. Department of Justice.

• Data Storage IP Case Aids In Untangling Similar Claim Terms

  

  The Federal Circuit's recent reversal of a decision to invalidate a digital storage patent demonstrates the importance of closely analyzing the intrinsic record to fill definitional gaps during claim construction, say Kyle Ryman and Joel Thollander at McKool Smith.

• Perspectives

  How Attorneys Can Help Combat Anti-Asian Hate

  

  Amid an exponential increase in violence against Asian American and Pacific Islander communities, unique obstacles stand in the way of accountability and justice — but lawyers can effect powerful change by raising awareness, offering legal representation, advocating for victims’ rights and more, say attorneys at Gibson Dunn.

• Opinion

  Congress Needs To Enact A Federal Anti-SLAPP Statute

  

  Although many states have passed statutes meant to prevent individuals or entities from filing strategic lawsuits against public participation, other states have not, so it's time for Congress to enact a federal statute to ensure that free speech and petitioning rights are uniformly protected nationwide in federal court, say attorneys at Skadden.

• Financial Industry Must Beware Rising BIPA Litigation Tide

  

  As Biometric Information Privacy Act litigation engulfs more financial institutions, it’s important that they evaluate their practices for collecting biometric data, and to consider whether their vendors should comply with BIPA’s requirements, and even some related California laws, say attorneys at Katten.

• Why Fed. Circ. Should Explain Treatment Of Prior Art Ranges

  

  The Federal Circuit in UCB v. Actavis recently cited previous cases in holding that prior art disclosure of a range is not a disclosure of its endpoints, but the appeals court needs to more thoroughly explore the basis for this decades-old patentability precedent, say Ben Katzenellenbogen and Paul Stewart at Knobbe Martens.

• A Watershed Moment For Microbiome-Based Therapy

  

  While there has been limited microbiome patent enforcement so far, the regulatory approvals of three microbiome-related products and the case of Ferring v. Finch indicate that microbiome patent litigation could take off, and may spur greater investment in this space, say Mark FitzGerald and Alissa Young at Nixon Peabody.

• Some Client Speculations On AI And The Law Firm Biz Model

  

  Generative artificial intelligence technologies will put pressure on the business of law as it is structured currently, but clients may end up with more price certainty for legal services, and lawyers may spend more time being lawyers, says Jonathan Cole at Melody Capital.

• Shkreli Cos. Bankruptcy Illustrates Novel Subchapter V Trend

  

  Vyera Pharmaceuticals and related companies founded by convicted "Pharma Bro" Martin Shkreli recently filed for bankruptcy under Subchapter V in Delaware, becoming the latest case to show the appeal of the subchapter for debtors with large contingent or unliquidated liabilities seeking a more efficient form of bankruptcy, says Sam Ashuraey at Paul Hastings.

• A Look At Texas Business Courts' Potential M&A Impact

  

  A bill heading to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's desk is a push for specialist judges with more expertise in the business area, but it is unlikely to have an immediate effect on mergers and acquisition practitioners and contracts, for several important reasons, says Candace Groth at Vela Wood.