In Re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001

Track this case

Case Number:

1:03-md-01570

Court:

New York Southern

Nature of Suit:

P.I.: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action, Multi-district Litigation

Judge:

George B. Daniels

Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. May 09, 2022

    9/11 Plaintiffs Want Court To Reject Filing Over Disputed $3.5B

    A group of plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation over the 9/11 terror attacks have urged the court to toss a filing from other plaintiffs alleging a proposed distribution plan for $3.5 billion in Afghan funds is inequitable, arguing the filing was unauthorized and inaccurate.

  2. May 06, 2022

    Hundreds Of 9/11 Families Seek Oversight For $3.5B Fund

    More than 800 families of 9/11 victims have asked a New York federal court to appoint a special master to oversee the distribution of a $3.5 billion compensation fund amid a heated debate over how to split the money.

  3. April 28, 2022

    9/11 Judge Tosses 'Duplicative' Suit Over Split Of $3.5B Fund

    A judge overseeing multidistrict litigation over the 9/11 terror attacks has dismissed a related suit filed by several plaintiffs seeking to enforce an "equitable distribution" of $3.5 billion in Afghan funds, saying it is "duplicative" of issues within the MDL.

  4. April 21, 2022

    9/11 Family Wants 'Equitable Split' Of $3.5B Afghanistan Fund

    Plaintiffs involved in multidistrict litigation over the 9/11 terror attacks have launched a separate proposed class action seeking to freeze a $3.5 billion fund of Afghan assets set aside for victims, saying a few families' claims might drain the entire fund.

  5. March 30, 2022

    9/11 Plaintiffs Spar Over Approach To $3.5B In Afghan Funds

    A group of plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation over the 9/11 terror attacks pushed back Wednesday against other plaintiffs' proposal for a judgment against the Taliban, saying an underlying agreement between those other plaintiffs didn't appear to treat all victims fairly.

  6. March 07, 2022

    Report Says Taliban Takeover Moots Afghanistan's 9/11 Motion

    The federal magistrate judge who effectively oversees multidistrict litigation over the 9/11 terror attacks has recommended that a motion for summary judgment filed by Afghanistan's former government should be ruled moot in light of the Taliban takeover of the country.

  7. January 19, 2022

    Kreindler Says 9/11 Case Leak Doesn't Warrant Sanctions

    Kreindler & Kreindler LLP has argued that it should not face sanctions over a former consultant's leak of a deposition from litigation over the 9/11 terrorist attacks, as Saudi Arabia argued the firm willfully violated the protective orders covering the case.

  8. November 19, 2021

    Kreindler Must Reveal Who Attended Leaked 9/11 MDL Depo

    A Manhattan federal judge ruled Friday that Saudi Arabia can obtain more information related to its allegation that Kreindler & Kreindler LLP violated discovery rules by allowing individuals to attend a confidential deposition which was later leaked to the media by a firm consultant, in multidistrict litigation over the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

  9. November 15, 2021

    Kreindler, Saudis Continue Fight Over 9/11 Deposition Hearing

    Saudi Arabia and Kreindler & Kreindler LLP have continued to spar over a contentious hearing related to the leak of a deposition from litigation over the 9/11 terrorist attacks, with each side accusing the other of mischaracterizing related testimony and court filings. 

  10. November 10, 2021

    Saudis Want Kreindler To Say Who Attended 9/11 Deposition

    Saudi Arabia has asked a judge in litigation over the 9/11 terrorist attacks to order Kreindler & Kreindler LLP to explain who was allowed to attend a contentious deposition, saying a recent hearing had indicated unauthorized people were present.