Case Activity (29471)

1. Order | Filed: August 10, 2026 | Entered: August 10, 2026 JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Argus Information & Advisory Services Inc. et al

   Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | Delaware

   Oral Order

   ORAL ORDER: I GRANT in part and DENY in part JPMorgan's motion to compel [ECF No. 260 . Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses need not be omniscient, nor predict each specific question he will be asked. And the noticed topics were often quite broad, while some of JPMCs questions were about specific details. Nonetheless, Azar indicated that he did not investigate certain issues that fall within the noticed topics. So I ORDER Verisk to provide answers to (1) the questions that compose Subjects 1, 13, and 14; (2) no more than three questions from JPMorgan regarding Subjects 8 and 9, and (3) eight questions regarding Subject 11, from ECF No. 260-1. Verisk shall provide these responses in a written declaration by Azar (or, if necessary, another appropriate 30(b)(6) witness), within the bounds of the parties agreement as to the relevant topics scope. Finally, Verisk's counsel represented that Azar could not learn about several issues related to Verisk's acquisition of Argus because the relevant employees have left the company [ECF No. 261 at 3]; to the extent Azar did not already do so at his deposition, I ORDER Verisk to detail Azars attempts to investigate those matters despite the teams departure. JPMorgans motion is otherwise DENIED. Further, insofar as JPMorgan suggests that sanctions may be warranted here [ECF No. 260 at 3], I caution it that I do not see a basis for sanctions. Ordered by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 08/10/2026. (oam)

2. Misc | Filed: August 07, 2026 | Entered: August 07, 2026 JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Argus Information & Advisory Services Inc. et al

   Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | Delaware

   Redacted Document

   REDACTED VERSION of 264 Letter,,, to Honorable Stephanos Bibas from Michael A. Barlow regarding regarding Defendants Verisk's Letter Brief Regarding Plaintiff JPMCs Failure to Sufficiently Prepare its Corporate Designee Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). by Verisk Analytics, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-JPMC Third Amended Initial Disclosures, # 2 Exhibit 2-Correspondence re Discovery, # 3 Exhibit 3-Verisk 30(b)(6) Notice and JPMC Responses and Objections, # 4 Exhibit 4-Argus and TU Notice and JPMC Responses and Objections, # 5 Exhibit 5-Correspondence re Discovery, # 6 Exhibit 6-Excerpts from 30(b)(6) Deposition of JPMC, # 7 Exhibit 6-Correspondence re Discovery, # 8 Exhibit 8-Correspondence re Discovery, # 9 Exhibit 9-JPMC_00019071, # 10 Exhibit 10-JPMC 30(b)(6) Ex. A, # 11 Text of Proposed Order, # 12 Certificate of Service)(Barlow, Michael)

3. 29469 additional result(s)