Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
BBB Attorneys
-
Minutes | Filed: June 11, 2024 | Entered: June 12, 2024 Scricca et al v. Boppy Company, LLC et al
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability | Connecticut
Motion Hearing
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Thomas O. Farrish: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 6/11/2024, re 127 MOTION to Compel Responses to Plaintiffs' Second Set of RFP #1 through #6 filed by Angel Miguel Rodriguez, Anthony Scricca, Coleen Rodriguez, 126 MOTION to Compel Defendant Boppy's Responses to Plaintiffs' Third Set of RFP filed by Angel Miguel Rodriguez, Anthony Scricca, Coleen Rodriguez. Time 29 minutes(Court Reporter Court Smart.) (Wood, R.)
-
Order | Filed: June 11, 2024 | Entered: June 11, 2024 Scricca et al v. Boppy Company, LLC et al
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability | Connecticut
Order on Motion to Compel
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 127 Motion to Compel. For the reasons stated on the record at today's telephonic hearing, the Court resolves the motion as follows:
* With respect to Requests for Production Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that the defendant, The Boppy Company, LLC ("Boppy"), is ordered to produce (a) the contract(s) in force between itself and Meltwater News US Inc. ("Meltwater") for the period January 1, 2015 to November 8, 2019; and (b) any user manual for Meltwater services that it used between January 1, 2015 and November 8, 2019. The motion is otherwise denied as to Request for Production Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
* The motion is denied on the current record as to Request for Production Nos. 4, 5, and 6. Boppy states that it has complied with these requests as they relate to the Boppy Newborn Lounger, notwithstanding its prolix objections.
During today's conference, plaintiff's counsel indicated that he had developed reasons to suppose that Boppy's production is incomplete, at least with respect to Request for Production No. 6. The Court declined to consider this new information on a motion that has been the subject of lengthy briefing and nearly an hour's worth of oral argument, and which the Court deemed fully submitted almost a month ago. With that said, the Court wishes to be clear with Boppy that nothing in this ruling should be construed as foreclosing future inquiry by the plaintiffs into the reports that Boppy received from Meltwater, provided that inquiry is properly limited as to time and product line. While the Court will not grant the plaintiffs the particular relief they requested with respect to the particular Requests for Production on which they moved, the parties are directed to continue to meet and confer in a good faith effort to agree upon the scope of discovery with respect to this issue.
Finally, Boppy's compliance with the foregoing production orders is due by June 25, 2024. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 37(d). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 06/11/2024. (Farrish, Thomas) -
Order | Filed: June 11, 2024 | Entered: June 11, 2024 Scricca et al v. Boppy Company, LLC et al
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability | Connecticut
Order on Motion to Compel
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 126 Motion to Compel. For the reasons stated on the record at today's telephonic hearing, the Court resolves the motion as follows:
* With respect to Request for Production No. 1, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that the defendant, The Boppy Company, LLC ("Boppy"), is ordered to re-produce in unredacted form the social media policy that it previously produced in redacted form. The motion is otherwise denied as to Request for Product No. 1.
* With respect to Request for Production No. 2, the motion is granted. Boppy is ordered to produce all documents responsive to Request for Production No. 2.
* The motion is denied as moot with respect to Request for Production Nos. 3 and 8, the parties having reported that they resolved their disputes over those requests by negotiation.
* With respect to Request for Production Nos. 4, 5, and 6, the motion is granted. Boppy shall produce all documents responsive to those requests.
* The motion is denied with respect to Request for Production No. 7, without prejudice to a new request that is much more narrowly tailored and less facially overbroad and unduly burdensome.
Boppy shall comply with the foregoing production orders by June 25, 2024. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 37(d). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 06/11/2024. (Farrish, Thomas)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login