Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Dowd Bloch x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Other | Illinois Central
Order on Motion for Summary Judgment ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 7/6/2026. Defendant Fuayo Glass Illinois has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment 54 and Memorandum in Support 55 . When discussing the requirements for motions for summary judgment, Local Rule 7.1(D)(1)(b) provides, "List and number each undisputed material fact which is the basis for the motion for summary judgment. Include as exhibits to the motion all relevant documentary evidence." Defendant Fuayo's Memorandum fails to follow this requirement. The Memorandum contains an "Additional Facts" section that lists paragraphs of facts that are unnumbered. Accordingly, Defendant Fuayo's Motion for Summary Judgment 54 and Memorandum in Support 55 are STRICKEN. Within 14 days, Defendant Fuayo is directed to refile its Motion and Memorandum, clearly listing and numbering each undisputed material fact. In addition, Plaintiff filed a Response 62 in opposition. Under Local Rule 7.1(D)(2)(b), a response to a motion for summary judgment must "[l]ist by number each fact from the motion for summary judgment which is conceded to be undisputed and material", "is conceded to be material but is claimed to be disputed", "is claimed to be both immaterial and disputed", and "is undisputed but is claimed to be immaterial." "Each claim of disputed fact must be supported by evidentiary documentation referenced by specific page." The response must also state "the reason the fact is immaterial" and "[s]upport the claim that the fact is disputed with evidentiary documentation referenced by specific page." In addition, the response must "[l]ist and number each additional material fact raised in opposition to the motion for summary judgment." Plaintiff's Response fails to follow these requirements. Plaintiff does not list by number each fact from either of Defendants' motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff does not state which fact is conceded to be material, claimed to be disputed, or claimed to be immaterial. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Response 62 is STRICKEN. Within 14 days of Defendant Fuayo refiling its motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff is directed to refile a response that fully complies with the local rules. Plaintiff is warned that a "failure to respond to any numbered fact will be deemed an admission of the fact." Local Rule 7.1(D)(2)(b)(6). Within 14 days of Plaintiff refiling a response, both Defendants may file a motion to strike their present replies and refile updated replies, if necessary. (FDS)
Memorandum in Support of Motion/Petition
MEMORANDUM in Support re 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment Motion of Defendant USW Local 193-G for Summary Judgment Reply Brief in Support of Motion of Defendant USW Local 193-G for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant United Steelworker 193-G. (Yokich, Stephen)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.