Order | Filed: June 26, 2026
| Entered: June 26, 2026
Aguilar Gonzalez v. Baltazar et al
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee | Colorado
Minute Order
MINUTE ORDER: On June 15, 2026, the Court granted the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , in part to the extent that it ordered the respondents to provide the petitioner with a bond hearing within seven days. ECF No. 9 . On June 18, 2026, the respondents filed a status report indicating that a bond hearing was held, and the petitioner was granted bond. ECF No. 10 . Accordingly, this case is now closed. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 06/26/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan)
Order | Filed: June 25, 2026
| Entered: June 25, 2026
Mamozai v. Baltazar et al
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee | Colorado
Order to Show Cause
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on June 25, 2026. This matter is before the court on Petitioner Abdul Majid Mamozai's 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner shall, by overnight mail and email, serve Respondents with a copy of the Petition and this Order on or before June 28, 2027. Petitioner shall file proof of service. Within seven days of service, respondents shall SHOW CAUSE why the 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The writ, or order to show cause shall be directed to the person having custody of the person detained. It shall be returned within three days unless for good cause additional time, not exceeding twenty days, is allowed."). Petitioner may file a reply within seven days of Respondents filing their response.
Respondents are further ORDERED to address all legal arguments raised in the Petition and, further, to explain: (1) why Petitioner continues to be held without a bond hearing after being granted asylum by an Immigration Judge; (2) the basis for Respondents' appeal of the Immigration Judge's decision; and (3) whether Respondents consider Petitioner a security risk.
In addition, the Supreme Court has recognized that the express authority granted by the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, empowers lower courts, in limited circumstances, to issue temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect the status quo or their own jurisdiction. See FTC v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 603, 608 (1966). Unless appropriately confined by Congress, a federal court may avail itself of all auxiliary writs as aids in the performance of its duties, when the use of such historic aids is calculated in its sound judgment to achieve the ends of justice entrusted to it. United States v. N.Y. Tel. Co. , 434 U.S. 159, 17273 (1977) (quotation omitted).
Pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), and in order to preserve the court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado into the jurisdiction of any other federal district court within the United States unless or until this court or the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. See Vizguerra-Ramirez v. Choate, No. 25-cv-00881-NYW, ECF No. 11 at 45 (D. Colo. Mar. 21, 2025) (collecting cases); Vazquez v. Baltazar, No. 25-cv-03049-GPG-TPO, ECF No. 11 (D. Colo. Oct. 2, 2025); Dean Foods Co. , 384 U.S. at 603; Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n v. N.Y. Shipping Ass'n, 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992).
It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file a completed Magistrate Judge consent form (ECF No. 3 ) no less than seven days from the date of this Order. Text Only Entry. (spblc11)