Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Husch Blackwell
-
Misc | Filed: April 23, 2024 | Entered: April 23, 2024 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Express Scripts, Inc.
Contract: Other | Michigan Eastern
Statement of Resolved and Unresolved Issues
STATEMENT of Resolved and Unresolved Issues re 33 MOTION compel production of documents MOTION to Compel by All Plaintiffs (Stenerson, Todd)
-
Filed: April 23, 2024 | Entered: April 23, 2024 Meacham v. United States Department of Education Office for Civil Rights
360(P.I.: Other) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: The Court is in receipt of several motions from Plaintiff Meacham. First, Meacham's motion for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss 39 is denied. The Court has already granted Meacham multiple extensions of time, 16 , 22 , 28 , and she has now had over 5 months to respond to the United States's motion 4 , over 4 months to respond to Defendant Board of Trustees' motion 14 , and nearly 3 months to respond to the Illinois Defendants' motion. 19 . The Court cautioned Meacham several times that she should focus on responding to the motions to dismiss, but she instead inundated the Court with several separate filings raising separate issues and claims. Further, the Court notes that Meacham's motion for an extension is itself 77 pages, which suggests that Meacham has had more than enough time to prepare a response, but has instead focused her efforts on other filings. The motion 39 is therefore denied. The Court will consider Meacham's arguments made in her prior filings to the extent they are relevant to the motion to dismiss, but will not allow her further time to respond. As to the motion to withdraw the attached complaint 40 , that motion is denied as well. Meacham appears to take issue with the fact that Defendant Board of Trustees attached a prior complaint from another case to their motion to dismiss. There is nothing improper about the Board seeking to introduce that complaint as an exhibit to their motion to provide support for their arguments. The Court understands the complaint is from another case and does not represent Meacham's complaint in this case, but the Court may consider the complaint insofar as it is relevant to any arguments in the Board's motion. Finally, as to Meacham's motion for leave to amend, the Court is not inclined to grant Meacham the 120 days she requests to amend the complaint, given the months that have already passed. Having said that, the Court will first allow Defendants an opportunity to respond to the motion to raise any arguments as to whether additional amendment should be allowed. Defendants should respond to the motion to amend 41 at the same time they file their replies in support of their motions to dismiss on 5/22/2024. (ca, ) (Entered: 04/23/2024)
-
Order | Filed: April 23, 2024 | Entered: April 23, 2024 In re Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate) Antitrust Litigation
Anti-Trust | California Northern
Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Order on Stipulation
ORDER ON 605 613 616 626 628 647 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO RE-FILE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 4/23/2024. (svklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2024)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login