Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Kolman Law x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Assault Libel & Slander | Pennsylvania Middle
Judgment - Clerk
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Kelly Matich against Gina Marie Berumen O'Brien, Trisia Sepulveda. JUDGMENT OF LIABIILTY is entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants with respect to the plaintiffs claim for intrusion upon seclusion invasion of privacy, set forth in Count VI of the amended complaint; Signed by Deputy Clerk on 9/30/26. (ms)
Order
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:1.The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. 54) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;2.Th e plaintiffs motion is GRANTED with respect to the plaintiffs claim for intrusion upon seclusion invasion of privacy, set forth in Count VI of the amended complaint;3.The plaintiffs motion is DENIED with respect to all other claims;4.The clerk is dir ected to enter JUDGMENT OF LIABIILTY in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants with respect to the plaintiffs claim for intrusion upon seclusion invasion of privacy, set forth in Count VI of the amended complaint;5.The parties are directed to SHOW CAUSE why summary judgment should not be entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff with respect to the plaintiffs claims of defamation (Count I), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count II), false light invasio n of privacy (Count III), defamation by innuendo (Count IV), statutory identity theft (Count V), and tortious interference with contractual relations (Count VII);6.Each party shall file a brief in response to the courts order to show cause within thi rty (30) days after entry of this order, see M.D. Pa. LR 7.6, each of which shall be accompanied by a separate, short, and concise statement of the material facts, responding to the numbered paragraphs of the courts statement of material facts in the accompanying Memorandum, as to which it is contended that there exists a genuine dispute of material fact, see M.D. Pa. L.R. 56.1;7.Each party may file a reply brief, if desired, within fourteen (14) days after service of another partys brief in response to the courts order to show cause; and8.The court will defer setting this matter down for a jury trial until after disposition of the courts sua sponte motion for summary judgment. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/30/26 (ms)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.