Case Activity (323)

1. Answer | Filed: September 12, 2026 | Entered: September 12, 2026 LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. et al v. LONGO et al

   Trademark | New Jersey

   Answer to Amended Complaint Crossclaim Counterclaim

   ANSWER to Amended Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against ANTHONY LONGO, COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by GEORGE TRAPANI, TRAPANI RACE SETUPS, INC..(ROBEDEE, WILLIAM)

2. Order | Filed: September 02, 2026 | Entered: September 02, 2026 LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. et al v. LONGO et al

   Trademark | New Jersey

   Text Order ~Util - Terminate Motions

   TEXT ORDER: This matter comes before the Court upon review of the docket. On 08/04/2026, the Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file an Amended Complaint. (Docket Entry No. 33 .) On 08/07/2026, Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint. (Docket Entry No. 34 .) In the interest of judicial efficiency and considering that Defendants Trapani Race Setups, Inc. and George Trapani (collectively, the "Trapani Defendants") have appeared in this action through counsel, the Court, in its discretion, directs the Trapani Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint by 09/14/2026. See United States v. Washington, 869 F.3d 193, 220 (3d Cir. 2017) (noting that "[a]s we have often said, matters of docket control...are committed to [the] broad discretion of the district court."); Gerald Chamles Corp. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc., 247 F.R.D. 453, 455 (D.N.J. 2007) (stating that it is "well-settled that Magistrate Judges have broad discretion to manage their docket[.]"). As the Trapani Defendants must respond anew to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 22 ) is terminated without prejudice. To the extent the Trapani Defendants reassert their counterclaim, Plaintiffs' right to seek dismissal of the same is preserved. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni on 9/02/2026. (jem)

3. 321 additional result(s)