Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Leonidou & Rosin
-
Order | Filed: May 06, 2024 | Entered: May 06, 2024 Bayview Industrial Services, Inc. v. Heffler Contracting Group et al
Miller Act | California Northern
~Util - Case Assigned/Reassigned Order Reassigning Case
Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Virignia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras., ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Virignia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to case (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(smc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2024)
-
Utility | Filed: May 06, 2024 | Entered: May 06, 2024 Bayview Industrial Services, Inc. v. Heffler Contracting Group et al
Miller Act | California Northern
~Util - Notice Assigning/ Reassigning Case (CRJ)
This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (smc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2024)
-
Other Event | Filed: May 06, 2024 | Entered: May 06, 2024 Bayview Industrial Services, Inc. v. Heffler Contracting Group et al
Miller Act | California Northern
Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned.
ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED.
This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2024)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login