Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Pullman Comley x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Consumer Credit | Connecticut
Order
ORDER: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff’s response to the Order to Show Cause. ECF No. 80. The plaintiff states that he has entered into a settlement agreement with one of the defendants, CSG, the performance of which will be complete in March 2027. He “does not seek to continue active litigation against CSG while the Settlement Agreement is being performed,” ECF No. 80 at 2, and asks the Court to hold the matter in abeyance. Id. He requests that the Court not dismiss his claims against CSG. Id. He is concerned about potential enforcement issues and requests that the Court not dismiss his claims against CSG until the “settlement has been fully performed and all funds have cleared.” Id.
The Court declines to let the matter pend until the agreement has been fully performed. “[C]ourts routinely dismiss actions with prejudice upon report of a settlement by the parties.” Tangtiwatanapaibul v. Tom & Toon Inc., No. 1:17-CV-00816 (KHP), 2021 WL 3774310, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2021), aff'd, No. 20-3852, 2022 WL 17574580 (2d Cir. Dec. 12, 2022).
To the extent that the plaintiff requests that the Court retain jurisdiction over the settlement agreement to address potential enforcement issues, it is the Court’s practice not to do so, as set forth on the Court’s website. See https://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/content/michael-p-shea. If, however, the parties wish the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce an agreement, the parties must place the terms of their settlement agreement on the public record and must provide reasons for the Court’s retention of jurisdiction. The parties may either provide a copy of the settlement agreement for the Court to endorse or include the terms of their settlement agreement in their stipulation of settlement and dismissal.
If the parties wish to proceed in this manner, the settlement agreement must be filed on the docket within 7 days of this order. If the agreement is not so filed, the Court will dismiss CSG.
Other Statutes: Anti-Trust | Pennsylvania Eastern
ORDER that upon consideration of the joint motion to stay andotherwise extend all deadlines from Defendant Dr. Reddys Laboratories, Inc. (Dr. Reddy's)and Plaintiff Humana Inc. (Humana), it is ORDERED and DECREED that the motion [18-cv-3299, Doc. No. 814; 16-md-2724, Doc. No. 4793] is GRANTED. All deadlines in the above captioned action between Dr. Reddy's and Humana are stayed for a period of forty five (45) days after the date of this Order. Dr. Reddys is excused from attending the pretrial conferences. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/31/2026. 7/31/2026 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (APPLIES TO CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-3299)(kp)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.