Case Activity (120)

1. Order | Filed: August 28, 2026 | Entered: August 28, 2026 Hart et al v. Olmos

   Civil Rights: Other | California Eastern

   Minute Order ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

   MINUTE ORDER (Text Only): In light of the pending motion to dismiss (Doc. 16 ), the Initial Scheduling Conference set for September 10, 2026 at 10:00 AM and all related deadlines are VACATED. (See Doc. 22 ). Within (10) ten days after the issuance of a ruling on the pending motion, should the matter proceed in this court, the parties are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Patricia Apodaca (papodaca@caed.uscourts.gov) to secure a new scheduling conference date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 8/28/2026. (Deputy Clerk PAA)

2. Order | Filed: April 17, 2026 | Entered: April 17, 2026 Terra Bella Irrigation District et al v. Haaland et al

   Civil Rights: Other | California Eastern

   Minute Order

   MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on April 17, 2026: On April 15, 2026, Plaintiffs and Defendants Friant Water Authority, filed a stipulation for to stay the case on the basis that the parties had entered into a settlement agreement with performance to be completed December 2026, and asking that the Court stay the case until January 31, 2027. (ECF No. 43 ). On April 16, 2026, the Court granted the stipulation and ordered the case stayed until January 31, 2027, at which time a voluntarily dismissal signed by all parties would be submitted if, or if no voluntary dismissal was filed by this point, the stay would be lifted. (ECF No. 45 ). On April 16, 2026, the United States filed a response to the stipulation, noting that it had not signed the stipulation and objecting to a stay in this case because of its position that the case is now moot. (ECF No. 44 ). The Court has reviewed the United States' response and will not reconsider its order granting the requested stay. The United States has not filed any motion to dismiss this case based on mootness or provided any evidence or reasoned argument why the case should be dismissed in its entirety rather than stayed pending performance under the settlement agreement. The United States appears to agree with the stipulation to the extent that it represents that there is a settlement agreement in place that is to be performed by December 2026, and if performance is completed by that date, the parties will jointly stipulate to dismiss this case. Nor does the United States ask for permission to engage in any litigation during the period of the stay. Thus, while acknowledging the United States' position, the Court finds that the stay remains appropriate and will remain as previously ordered. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk FMN)

3. 118 additional result(s)