Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Weinberg Gross x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Real Property: Other | New York Eastern
Status Report Order
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of defense counsel's letter requesting an additional ten days for Defendants to contact counsel and communicate whether they intend to defend this action. See ECF No. 162 . Defense counsel's request is granted. Accordingly, on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2026, Defendants shall communicate with their counsel and indicate whether they intend to defend this action. Again, the Court warns Defendants that if they do not communicate with their counsel by 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2026, and continue to ignore their counsel in connection with this matter, the Court will find that they have failed to defend this action and enter default judgment against them. See June 26, 2026, Text Order (citing City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC, 645 F.3d 114, 129 (2d Cir. 2011); Eagle Associates v. Bank of Montreal, 926 F.2d 1305, 1310 (2d Cir. 1991)).Defense counsel is directed to send a copy of this Order and the Court's June 26, 2026, Order to Defendants by email and by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Defense counsel shall also attempt to communicate with his clients by telephone to communicate the content of these Orders and the potential consequences of non-compliance with these Orders. On or before noon on July 13, 2026, counsel shall file a letter certifying what efforts he undertook to serve this Order and the Court's June 26, 2026, Order on Defendants, whether he has communicated with Defendants, and, if so, whether Defendants intend to defend this action. In light of the numerous extensions that the Court has granted in connection with its June 26, 2026, Order and the protracted procedural history of this case, the Court warns the parties that it will not grant extension requests in perpetuity and it will not grant further extensions to the deadlines set forth above. If the parties do not comply with these deadlines, the Court will find that Defendants have failed to defend this action and enter default judgment against them. See Eagle Associates, 926 F.2d at 1310 (finding the district court properly entered default judgment when "confronted by a recalcitrant party who failed to comply with its order" and that "cavalier disregard for a court order is a failure, under Rule 55(a), to otherwise defend"). Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/1/2026. (CBF)
Letter
Letter to Judge Gonzalez by Anjali Soni, Om P. Soni (Pergament, Marc)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.