Case Activity (3312)

1. Order | Filed: August 21, 2026 | Entered: August 21, 2026 Arthur James et al v. County of San Bernardino et al

   Civil Rights: Other | California Central

   Enforce

   MINUTES TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Angela C. C. Viramontes: finding as moot 112 MOTION to Enforce. Based on the agreement reached by the parties on July 21, 2026, the Motion to Enforce regarding Canyon Ridge Hospital is resolved. The Motion is DENIED as moot. <No Attachment>

2. Order | Filed: August 21, 2026 | Entered: August 21, 2026 Emilio Garcia v. Roc Nation LLC et al

   Labor: Other | New York Southern

   Memo Endorsement

   MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 180 Letter filed by Emilio Garcia. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Plaintiff no longer seeks to seal Exhibits B and Z. The Court observes that Exhibit Z, Dkt. Nos. 161-18 and 162-18, is already viewable by the public. As for Exhibit B, the Clerk of Court is directed to change the viewing level on Dkt. Nos. 159-1 and 160-1 so that that document can be viewed by the public as well as the parties and the Court. Plaintiff's request to refile Exhibits P, Q, S, V, W, Y, AA, and AC on the public docket with limited redactions of Personally Identifiable Information consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a) is granted. Plaintiff's request to redact phone numbers, email addresses, and addresses within those same exhibits is also granted. As explained in the Court's August 7, 2026, Memorandum Opinion & Order, Dkt. No. 176, there is a long-established "general presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents," Collado v. City of New York, 193 F. Supp. 3d 286, 288 (S.D.N.Y. 2016), and a "qualified First Amendment right of access to documents submitted to the court in connection with a summary judgment motion." Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006). Such documents may be sealed if "specific, on the record findings are made demonstrating that closures is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest." United States v. Greenwood, 145 F.4th 248, 255 (2d. Cir. 2025). Consistent with this Court's earlier order, Dkt. No. 176, the redaction of phone numbers, email addresses, and addresses is narrowly tailored to protect the higher value of individuals' privacy interests. See Greenwood, 145 F.4th at 256. Redacted versions of those exhibits must be filed no later than June 25, 2026. The Clerk of Court is directed to change the viewing level on Dkt. Nos. 159-1 and 160-1 so that they can be viewed by the public as well as the parties and the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/21/2026) (sgz)

3. 3310 additional result(s)