WeWork is reportedly nearing a deal to take as much as 500,000 square feet in New York, Henley's U.S. division is said to have dropped $20 million on a Miami hotel, and a Blackstone affiliate has reportedly bought a Florida grocery-anchored shopping center for $34.5 million.
One of the smallest of this year’s Law360 Florida Powerhouses, Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP regularly punches above its weight class, by working on transformational projects like a $2.4 billion passenger train from Miami to Orlando and defending clients in high-stakes mortgage lawsuits.
The Eleventh Circuit on Tuesday revived a woman’s claims that she was injured by a Johnson & Johnson unit’s defective pelvic mesh implant, saying her report of her symptoms did not toll the statute of limitations because she had no reason to blame them on the alleged defect.
An Eleventh Circuit panel has backed various decisions from a lower court that ruled against an impulse merchandising-focused company in a former worker’s suit claiming he was sexually harassed by a female supervisor and not paid certain wages.
The U.S. Senate confirmed two women, Ariana Fajardo Orshan and Maria Chapa Lopez, as the top prosecutors in the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida in a voice vote Tuesday evening.
The companies behind the promotional campaign for the Universal Pictures movie "Warcraft" on Tuesday shot back at a bid to certify a putative class action over an allegedly unlawful text message blast, telling a Florida federal judge that the plaintiffs' "overheated rhetoric" wasn't enough to overcome difficulties with identifying class members or proving they had actually been harmed.
The firms selected as Law360's 2018 Florida Powerhouses reflect the diverse character of the state in their varied histories, sizes and strategies while capitalizing on its rapidly growing industries and status as a crossroads of global business.
A Florida federal judge on Tuesday reduced by $12.2 million the restitution owed by an attorney for allegedly conspiring with former NFL player Willie Gault to inflate a heart-monitor company's stock, finding the attorney was responsible for only $1 million in losses.
A Florida federal judge on Monday trimmed a suit brought by national pediatric services provider Pediatrix Medical Services Inc. alleging Aetna Inc. has engaged in a systematic scheme to pressure and manipulate medical providers to reduce claims payments.
Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP announced Tuesday that it has added a multilingual international arbitration expert to its Miami office, where he will bring his expertise in resolving disputes in the construction, energy, infrastructure and hospitality industries.
Pan Am Equities has reportedly landed $60.6 million in financing for four New York projects, Sterling Bay is said to have picked up a Chicago warehouse for $2.7 million, and a KKR venture has reportedly received $141.5 million in financing for an office tower in Oakland, California.
Several companies in the ambulance industry will together pay more than $21 million to settle allegations that they knowingly submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid programs that ran afoul of federal bribery laws, in violation of the False Claims Act, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
Famed musicians Gloria and Emilio Estefan's Miami restaurant, Larios on the Beach, asked the Eleventh Circuit to revive its bid for $2.4 million in property damage coverage, asserting that the lower court erred by favoring the insurer based on an argument that wasn't raised by the parties.
A Florida federal judge on Tuesday dismissed an antitrust claim from Sentry Data Systems Inc. alleging CVS is unlawfully forcing health care providers to use its 340B Drug Pricing Program administrator Wellpartner LLC, but left intact allegations the pharmacy giant misappropriated trade secrets to steal customers.
A former Georgia county worker petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to find that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bars discrimination against gay employees on Friday characterized the county's opposition that a circuit split is too “recent” as meritless and its lack of other arguments “deafening.”
The Eleventh Circuit won’t let Geico challenge the certification of a class of Florida customers who alleged the insurance company flouted its own contract by failing to pay sales tax and transfer fees on leased vehicles after they were totaled, saying Monday the appeal was unnecessary.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has refused to register "Keto Whey" and other similar “keto” names as trademarks, finding they were merely descriptive for a line of ketogenic dietary supplements.
The Delaware Chancery Court on Monday trimmed claims brought against Spanish Broadcasting System Inc. by 11 funds that had invested in the company and are seeking redemption of $161 million in preferred stock and a bar on company debt additions, finding that the investors wanted relief already sought under breach of contract claims.
A California federal judge has granted state class certification for drivers in Colorado and Florida suing the importer and marketer of allegedly hazardous tires whose defects caused their treads to separate from their casings, but has denied certification of a nationwide class of drivers, citing material differences among the consumer protection laws in various states.
Fortis Property Group is reportedly listing a Long Island condo tower for $113 million, WeWork is said to be leasing nearly 7,000 square feet in New York, and Bank of America has reportedly loaned $20 million for refinance and renovations at a Florida hotel.
The majority of circuit courts that have addressed the issue have made clear that district courts should not consider inadmissible evidence when evaluating motions for class certification. In the final part of this series, Robert Sparkes of K&L Gates LLP presents a critique of the minority viewpoint as recently adopted by the Ninth Circuit in Sali v. Corona Regional Medical Center.
Can courts consider only admissible evidence at the class certification stage, or are motions for class certification governed by looser evidentiary standards? Robert Sparkes of K&L Gates LLP discusses the divergent decisions from the U.S. circuit courts of appeals addressing this issue, both in the context of expert and nonexpert evidence.
During movie awards season this year, "Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri" highlighted the power of a communication medium that some believe has been unduly muzzled over time through regulation and legal challenges, says Karina Saranovic of Delman Vukmanovic LLP.
Law firms are increasingly accepting cryptocurrency as payment for services. While this might seem innovative and forward-thinking, ironically it is much more of a throwback, says John Reed Stark of John Reed Stark Consulting LLC.
Revenue from the federal gas tax — last increased in 1993 — continues to decline, leaving infrastructure critically underfunded. But pilot programs in multiple states have now proven that mileage-based road user fees can replenish the Highway Trust Fund and be implemented practically and fairly, say Joshua Andrews, Charles Stitt and Theodore Bristol of Faegre Baker Daniels Consulting.
As the data shows, the U.S. Supreme Court's TC Heartland decision last year marked a major milestone in addressing extreme forum selection in patent law, and to some extent the threat of nonpracticing entity litigation abuse faced by startups. But other NPE problems need fixing, say Rachel Wolbers of Engine and Jonathan Stroud of Unified Patents Inc.
I agree with the legal pundits speculating that NewLaw’s present and future disruptors will radically change the legal services industry, but that change may not come quite as rapidly as predicted. Regardless, now is the time for both the incumbents and the challengers to best position themselves for the eventual shakeup, says Craig Levinson, founder of Levity Partners.
On the face of it, the Eleventh Circuit’s recent opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. LabMD might appear to be a major defeat for the agency and a significant victory for the company. But there is a problem: The panel undertook a cursory and questionable analysis of the scope of the FTC’s jurisdiction and ignored what should be a more fundamental question, says Stuart Gerson of Epstein Becker Green.
Legal pundits continue to make predictions that newer entrants into the industry — NewLaw firms, the Big Four and alternative legal service providers — will progressively seize greater amounts of market share from traditional law firms. But the BigLaw response has been underwhelming at best, and a glimpse at the market forces puts its lack of urgency into perspective, says Craig Levinson, founder of Levity Partners.
Despite the partiality some courts have shown to live video testimony, it provides no advantages — and several disadvantages — over the tried-and-true method of videotaped depositions, say attorneys with Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP.