The last week has seen Chubb bring an action against U.S. forestry giant Weyerhaeuser, Russia's Kapital Insurance lodge a claim against more than a dozen insurers and reinsurers, and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme sue Heritage Corporate Trustees for breach of fiduciary duty. Here, Law360 looks at those and other new claims in the U.K.
A Nevada federal judge on Thursday sent to arbitration a Kellogg worker’s claim that the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by denying him proper overtime pay, finding the parties had “clearly and unmistakably” agreed that an arbitrator should decide whether the allegations are arbitrable.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development said Thursday that it's supplying an Egyptian yeast producer with a $52 million loan to expand its export business, its first deal with a Chinese-owned company.
Texas food retailer HEB Grocery Co. LP, one of the Lone Star State’s largest private employers, said Thursday it has purchased Favor Delivery, a popular and growing on-demand delivery service headquartered in Austin, for an undisclosed sum.
A California appeals court refused this week to revive a case filed by a "Goodfellas" actor who claimed his likeness was used without permission on the "The Simpsons," but there’s plenty more right of publicity action ahead in 2018. Here are four big cases to watch.
A Filipino family who entered the United States as legal permanent residents won a $387,621 verdict on Wednesday when a Colorado federal jury found they had been forced to work without wages for a family member who sponsored their entry.
In this monthly series, legal recruiting experts Amanda Brady and Amy Mallow of Major Lindsey & Africa interview law firm management from Am Law 200 firms about how they are navigating an increasingly competitive business environment. The second conversation is with Allison Friend, chief human resources officer for Hogan Lovells LLP.
A Washington federal judge found Tuesday that Cincinnati Insurance Co. needn’t cover Zaycon Foods Inc. for a fraud suit by a former co-leader of the company who claims he was ousted after investing millions, saying the suit doesn't contain any defamation claims and therefore isn't covered under advertising injury in the company's general liability policies.
A Texas frozen foods businessman convicted for a $5.3 million tax and wire fraud scheme doesn't have a Sixth Amendment right to use funds claimed by the government for a $1.2 million restitution order to hire counsel for his appeal, a Fifth Circuit panel said Wednesday.
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Wednesday granted preliminary approval to two mushroom farms looking to pay a combined $375,000 to settle out of broader class-action multidistrict litigation accusing growers and sellers of the fungi of a price-fixing conspiracy.
The Third Circuit on Tuesday affirmed the 6½-year sentence of a Philadelphia financial planner convicted of pilfering $400,000 from investors to buy a bar that later went bankrupt, saying the lower court was correct in finding he’d lied during the bankruptcy proceedings.
A group of Dunkin’ Donuts customers who say their Angus steak sandwiches didn’t include steak — just ground beef plus filler — urged a New York federal judge on Tuesday to reject the company's dismissal bid, disputing that they should have consulted ingredient lists.
One of the largest poultry producers in the United States asked a California federal judge on Tuesday to dismiss a suit from three nonprofits, along with other sanctions, due to "salacious" and "outlandish" allegations made based on U.S. Department of Agriculture test data the company claims was knowingly misrepresented.
Convenience store giant Circle K Stores Inc. on Tuesday was hit with a copyright infringement suit by a company that makes employee training videos for allegedly copying and distributing several videos to stores nationwide as part of mandatory training.
General Mills consumers accusing the company of misrepresenting its sugary cereals and bars as healthy urged a California federal court Tuesday to keep the proposed class action alive, saying the claims are not preempted and not based on puffery.
A California federal judge on Tuesday declined for a second time to certify a class of consumers accusing Gerber Products Co. of misbranding baby food, saying the company already changed the disputed labels and the proposed damages models are flawed.
Fast-food giant McDonald's was hit with a putative class action in Illinois federal court Tuesday from a customer who claims her and other visually impaired people's inability to access McDonald's during drive-thru-only hours is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
A pair of Korean ramen noodle companies asked a California federal judge Tuesday to decertify an indirect-purchaser class of noodle buyers from six states in a price-fixing action against the companies, arguing that a recent Ninth Circuit ruling raises the bar on certification of multistate classes.
British heavy metal band Iron Maiden is accusing several unidentified websites of selling counterfeit products that infringe its trademarks, according to a suit filed Monday in Illinois federal court.
The Third Circuit has upheld the dismissal of a man's claims that he was passed up for a job with the U.S. Department of Agriculture because of work-related criticisms he made about the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, his former employer, saying he failed to make specific claims that the USDA had blacklisted him.
As several recent decisions demonstrate, indirect purchaser plaintiffs aiming to establish that any price-fixing overcharges imposed by manufacturers were ultimately “passed through” to them face a formidable economic task, says Jon Tomlin of Navigant Consulting.
In "Justice and Empathy: Toward a Constitutional Ideal," the late Yale Law School professor Robert Burt makes a compelling case for the undeniable role of the courts in protecting the vulnerable and oppressed. But the question of how the judiciary might conform to Burt’s expectations raises practical problems, says U.S. Circuit Judge Allyson Duncan of the Fourth Circuit.
Foreign-language trademarks can be creative, appealing and exotic, but the doctrine of foreign equivalents presents a risk. It appears that the main criterion used by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board is still the number of speakers of a given language in the prospective marketplace where the marks will be utilized, says Davide Schiavetti of Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck PC.
As litigation funding becomes more widespread, greater complexity and variability in funding deals are to be expected. All claimants should consider certain key questions on the economics of single-case funding when considering or comparing funding terms, says Julia Gewolb of Bentham IMF.
Given the operational and security risks involved, and the substantial digital asset values transacted, the rise of distributed ledger technology and smart contracts will create new opportunities and responsibilities for transactional lawyers, say attorneys with Potter Anderson Corroon LLP.
A witness who has been told what to do and what not to do will be ineffective at best. Instead, witnesses must be taught how to handle the process, and how to approach the answer to every question that they encounter. These are new skills, and they must be practiced in order to be learned, says Ric Dexter, an independent litigation consultant.
Law firms claim they create client teams to improve service. Clients aren’t fooled, describing these initiatives as “thinly veiled sales campaigns.” Until firms and client teams begin to apply a number of principles consistently, they will continue to fail and further erode clients’ trust, says legal industry coach Mike O’Horo.
In U.S. v. Parnell, the Eleventh Circuit recently upheld the longest criminal sentences ever imposed in a food safety case. The court's opinion underlines the abiding significance of the criminal sanction within the food safety landscape, say Robert Hibbert and Hilary Lewis of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.
If you’re a California employer, perhaps no single law strikes fear into your heart quite as much as the Private Attorneys General Act. However, a pair of recent appellate court decisions granted significant procedural “wins” to employers in PAGA cases, says Benjamin Ebbink of Fisher Phillips.
While a client’s visual impairment can create challenges for an attorney, it also can open up an opportunity for both attorney and client to learn from each other. By taking steps to better assist clients who are blind or visually impaired, attorneys can become more perceptive and effective advisers overall, say Julia Satti Cosentino and Nicholas Stabile of Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP.