Pot Stock Puffery And Regulating An Illicit Industry

Law360, New York (September 3, 2014, 10:12 AM EDT) -- Corporations facing federal securities suits can sometimes avoid liability by showing that their forward-looking statements were so vague or indefinite that they could not have affected the company's stock price, and are therefore not material. Vague, forward-looking statements like these are not actionable because courts consider them "puffing," famously described by Judge Learned Hand nearly 100 years ago as "talk which no sensible man takes seriously." Though we cannot know today what Judge Hand would think of the civil complaint recently filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against several marijuana-company stock promoters, it's safe to say that this isn't the kind of "puffing" he had in mind....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!