A New York federal judge has told a group of Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. shareholders that they can't have another go at the restaurant chain, saying the supposed new information they proffered doesn't save their claims.
A Florida federal judge on Tuesday referred to a magistrate judge a motion for sanctions from a Carnival Corp. cruise passenger who says she wasn't properly treated after she suffered a stroke aboard the ship and that the company failed to produce a key document by a court-sanctioned deadline.
Wynn Resorts Ltd. urged a Massachusetts federal judge to dismiss corruption claims brought by an East Boston racetrack that said it lost out on $1 billion when Wynn beat it to a casino license, arguing the suit was filed too late and that the company is protected by the state’s anti-SLAPP law.
A New York federal judge on Tuesday tossed a proposed class action alleging Spirit Airlines Inc. defrauded consumers by concealing its carry-on bag fees on tickets sold through other online travel agents, saying federal law preempts their contract and fraud claims.
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. has won a new trial in a case that had resulted in a $3 million jury verdict against it stemming from the alleged sexual assault of a minor employee by her supervisor, with a Texas appellate court on Tuesday holding the jury should have been allowed to hear about the conduct of the employee.
The insurer for a Delaware opera house launched a federal lawsuit Monday against a company tasked with installing and monitoring the building’s heating, ventilation and air conditioning system, alleging the business is directly responsible for a system failure that led to widespread water damage at the facility.
Private-equity backed Gateway Casinos & Entertainment Limited on Tuesday filed a preliminary $100 million initial public offering that will enable existing shareholders to trim their stakes in the western Canadian casino operator, which is represented by Latham & Watkins LLP.
The Illinois Supreme Court pushed back Tuesday on Six Flags Entertainment Corp.'s stance that actual harm is required to sue under the state’s biometric privacy law as several justices explored the extent to which the statute protects against the collection of such personal data without consent.
Architecture firm Soos & Associates Inc. asked an Illinois federal court Monday to dismiss Five Guys' counterclaims in the firm's copyright infringement suit against the burger chain, saying its former client can’t plausibly argue the two agreed Five Guys could share Soos’ restaurant design plans with a competing architecture firm.
A Las Vegas jury on Monday found Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino responsible for a 400-pound sign that fell over and injured a hotel guest, but its $524,068 damages award stopped well short of the $35.1 million the man's attorney had requested.
A motel business hit back at an attempt by Sprint Solutions Inc. to put an end to its proposed class action, arguing in Connecticut federal court on Friday that the telecommunications company failed to prove that it had permission to repeatedly fax unsolicited ads to the lodging without an opt-out notice.
A California federal judge has trimmed several claims from a Williams & Cochrane LLP lawsuit saying a rival law firm conspired with a W&C tribal client to strip it of its business during gambling compact talks, ruling that W&C hasn't fully met the requirements for filing a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act suit.
A New Jersey federal judge has denied a racetrack's attempt to force four professional sports leagues and the NCAA to pay $3.4 million plus interest for launching litigation that stopped the track from taking sports bets until a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, saying the track wasn’t wrongfully blocked.
An Australian court has ordered a Japanese tourism and trading company to cover the costs a Swiss trading and shipping corporation incurred in its successful pursuit of arbitration in a coal supply dispute, saying their contract clearly contained an arbitration provision.
The co-founder of a defunct public air charter operator launched her second bid for a new trial in the government's case alleging she and others stole millions of dollars that passengers prepaid for flights, citing "exculpatory documents" that have materialized since she was convicted by a jury.
Financial holding company CIT Group Inc. said on Monday that its real estate finance business acted as the sole arranger for a $91 million senior secured loan to help finance the acquisition of a hotel in Denver by a joint venture between a private equity firm and real estate investment trust.
A shareholder for XO Group Inc. launched a proposed class action against the multimedia content publisher and its board of directors in Delaware federal court Friday, claiming a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission related to its $933 million acquisition by private equity-backed WeddingWire Inc. left out important financial analyses and projections.
An attorney for a man allegedly injured when a nearly 400-pound sign fell on him outside the Mandalay Bay hotel told a Las Vegas jury Friday to "send them a message" and award roughly $35.1 million — arguments the resort's counsel objected to as highly prejudicial.
Attorneys for Papa John's International Inc. and former CEO John Schnatter dueled using another fast-food chain’s symbol Friday during post-trial battling in Delaware Chancery Court over Schnatter’s expansive demands for board records after his ouster as both CEO and the pizza company’s public face.
Singapore-based CDL Hospitality Trusts said Friday it has acquired a 95 percent stake in an Italian hotel for €40.6 million ($46.3 million), marking the company's first foray into the country's hospitality market.
In this series featuring law school luminaries, Stanford Law School professor Jeffrey Fisher discusses his motivation for teaching, arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court and what the court might look like if Judge Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed.
IBM recently partnered with the U.S. Open to offer tennis fans a digital experience. This type of deal offers numerous benefits, but companies seeking to leverage their innovative technology in exchange for sponsorship packages should be aware of certain legal issues, say Leon Medzhibovsky and Airina Rodrigues of DLA Piper.
The first comprehensive overhaul of California's Rules of Professional Conduct in nearly 30 years becomes operational on Nov. 1. Some of the new rules mirror the model language used by the American Bar Association, but many continue to reflect California’s unique approach to certain ethical questions, says Mark Loeterman of Signature Resolution LLC.
The balancing act between protecting attorneys’ speech rights and ensuring unbiased adjudications was highlighted recently in two cases — when Michael Cohen applied for a restraining order against Stephanie Clifford's attorney, and when Johnson & Johnson questioned whether a Missouri talc verdict was tainted by public statements from the plaintiffs' counsel, says Matthew Giardina of Manning Gross & Massenburg LLP.
In Sheppard Mullin v. J-M Manufacturing Co., the California Supreme Court ruled last month that a law firm's failure to disclose a known conflict with another current client did not categorically disentitle the firm from recovering fees. But the court didn’t provide hoped-for guidance on how to write an enforceable advance conflict waiver, says Richard Rosensweig of Goulston & Storrs PC.
In this monthly series, Amanda Brady of Major Lindsey & Africa interviews management from top law firms about the increasingly competitive business environment. Here we feature Melanie Green, chief client development officer at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
A New York law that took effect this summer prohibits predispute agreements to arbitrate sexual harassment claims. Although well-intentioned, this provision is unlikely to significantly alter the status quo, say Ann-Elizabeth Ostrager and Jacob Singer of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.
In Martinez v. Landry Restaurants, a California state appeals court recently held that the time period during which a federal appeal from an order remanding a case to state court is pending should be included when calculating the “five-year rule” for bringing a case to trial. This shows that all counsel should consider whether to seek a stay of proceedings where the case crosses jurisdictional boundaries, says Karin Bohmholdt of Greenberg Traurig LLP.
The Third Circuit recently ruled in Encompass v. Stone Mansions that a defendant can remove a case to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction before the plaintiff formally serves the forum state defendant. This may be the first appellate decision on this issue, says Brittany Wakim of Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP.
In this new series featuring law school luminaries, Widener University Delaware Law School dean Rodney Smolla discusses teaching philosophies, his interest in First Amendment law, and arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court in Virginia v. Black.