Expert Analysis

• Opinion

  A Legal Response To DeSantis Migrant Flights May Not Suffice

  

  The U.S. Supreme Court's 2020 analysis in the Bridgegate case may foreshadow challenges in carrying out the legal consequences of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ alleged misuse of funds while relocating Venezuelan migrants to Massachusetts, making it an issue more for voters than the courts, says Bianca Forde at Otis Elevator.

• Opinion

  Ohio Workers' Suit Could Distort RICO And Trafficking Laws

  

  An Ohio federal court case over employment contract provisions — Carmen v. Health Carousel — may dramatically expand the scope of trafficking laws and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, which could put ordinary employment disputes under the purview of statutes meant to target organized crime and forced labor, says Noah Peters at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors.

• Series

  My Favorite Law Prof: How I Learned Education Never Ends

  

  D.C. Circuit Judge David Tatel reflects on what made Bernard Meltzer a brilliant teacher and one of his favorite professors at the University of Chicago Law School, and how Meltzer’s teachings extended well past graduation and guided Judge Tatel through some complicated opinions.

• Opinion

  New-Parent Attorneys Need Automatic Litigation Stays

  

  To facilitate parental leave for solo practitioners and small-firm attorneys excluded from the Family and Medical Leave Act's protections, the American Bar Association should amend its rules to implement automatic litigation stays for attorneys welcoming a new child, says attorney Gabriel Levy.

• Associate Skills That Impress Firms In A Cooling Job Market

  

  With the lateral hiring market calming down and law firms no longer overlooking resume deficiencies when evaluating candidates, associates at all levels should be cognizant of the skills and attributes that make them marketable to prospective employers, says J.B. Pullias at VOYlegal.

• High Court Could Resolve Thorny Atty-Client Privilege Issue

  

  The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted review in a federal grand jury proceeding that presents a rare opportunity to clarify — and possibly significantly expand — the scope of the attorney-client privilege for complex mixed-purpose communications with counsel, says David Greenwald at Jenner & Block.

• Minn.'s New Common Interest Doctrine: A Primer

  

  In its recent ruling in Energy Policy Advocates v. Ellison, the Minnesota Supreme Court adopted the common interest doctrine, extending confidentiality to communications between an attorney and client that include a third party — but successful use of the doctrine will require care, preparation and attention to detail, says George Singer at Ballard Spahr.

• Refining Info Governance As E-Discovery Gets More Complex

  

  Courts are increasingly requiring litigants to produce chats and other conversations recorded on business collaboration platforms as evidence, so companies should develop strategies for preserving and organizing such data to timely comply with e-discovery requests and to protect sensitive information, say attorneys at Akerman.

• Congressional Probes After The Midterms: Tips For Witnesses

  

  With the GOP planning a barrage of investigations into the Biden administration if it wins control of the House this fall, current and former government officials and corporate executives who might be called as witnesses must prepare to protect their personal interests — and those of their organizations, says Kevin Carroll at Hughes Hubbard.

• Risk Mitigation In Face Of Rising Legal Malpractice Claims

  

  As the recent rise in frequency and cost of legal malpractice claims is expected to continue amid global high inflation and economic uncertainty, law firms and insurers would be wise to evaluate key risk areas and consider six steps to minimize exposure, say Nicole Shapiro and Cory Stumpf at Atheria Law.

• Series

  Keys To A 9-0 High Court Win: Look For Common Ground

  

  When arguing for the petitioner in Golan v. Saada before the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year, a focus was placed on appealing to multiple judicial philosophies with the aim of not only winning each justice’s vote, but also achieving clear guidance from the court’s opinion, says Karen King at Morvillo Abramowitz.

• Latest Sanctions Narrow Path To Legal Dealings In Russia

  

  The latest round of sanctions and export controls from the U.S., U.K. and EU after Russia's purported annexation of Ukrainian regions demonstrates a commitment to strong sanctions, even in the face of heightened energy needs, and shows businesses the escalating risks associated with continued dealings in Russia, say attorneys at Kirkland.

• Limiting The Scope Of Representation Is Critical For Lawyers

  

  A Mississippi federal court's recent decision in Kee v. Howard L. Nations PC highlights the importance of well-written engagement letters, and shows why it is vital for attorneys to specify exactly which services they intend to supply, says Ronald Levine at Herrick Feinstein.

• Attys Shouldn't Assume Judicial Critique Is Protected Speech

  

  As it becomes more commonplace to see criticism of the judiciary in the media, licensed attorneys are well advised to remember that they may have less freedom than nonlawyers to make protected speech critical of the judiciary, says Mark Hinderks at Stinson.

• Series

  Keys To A 9-0 High Court Win: Practicality Over Perfection

  

  When I argued for the petitioner in Wooden v. U.S. last year, I discovered that preparation is key, but so is the right kind of preparation — in giving decisive answers to the U.S. Supreme Court justices' hypothetical questions I was not aiming for perfection, just the best response available, says Allon Kedem at Arnold & Porter.