Eighteen months after the U.S. Supreme Court limited where patent suits can be filed, courts continue to wrestle with questions about venue rules. Here is a look at recent decisions that have provided some guidance.
The Federal Circuit’s ruling that inventors can challenge their own patents in inter partes review puts to rest the issue of assignor estoppel at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, while illustrating the reach of the court’s ruling in Wi-Fi One.
The Federal Circuit has revived a patent infringement suit lodged by ArcelorMittal over certain steel sheets used in auto parts, ruling that the case wasn’t barred after finding it involved products that were substantially different from those at issue in earlier litigation.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is testing new software that gives patent examiners additional tools to identify whether a patent application incorporates existing technology, USPTO Director Andrei Iancu said Thursday.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation and T-Mobile, among others, have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a Federal Circuit decision that made it harder for courts to quickly invalidate patents for claiming patent-ineligible material, saying that the ruling has far-reaching consequences for patent litigation and innovation.
DraftKings and FanDuel told the Seventh Circuit on Wednesday that claims they violated college athletes' publicity rights by using student names, images and statistics in their daily fantasy sports contests should be tossed since the Indiana high court found such use to be newsworthy, although the athletes say there is still an open question as to whether the pay-to-play contests were legal in the state.
Fish & Richardson PC will make its first foray into China with an outpost in the technology hub of Shenzen, its second international office after Munich, after securing approval from China's Ministry of Justice to open a representative office, the intellectual property powerhouse announced Thursday.
A federal judge has denied three pharmaceutical companies' move to quash subpoenas for information on their plans to make generic substitutes of Allergan’s drug Restasis in multidistrict litigation over its alleged efforts to delay the generic versions’ launch, saying in-house counsel can view the data without compromising confidentiality.
Popular Texas convenience store chain Buc-ee's and Choke Canyon, a competing store that was found by a federal jury to infringe Buc-ee's beaver logo, agreed Thursday to dismiss the lawsuit, meaning the damages portion of the trial won't take place.
Siding with Omaha Steaks, the Federal Circuit on Thursday revived a case aimed at blocking a crosstown meat wholesaler called Greater Omaha Packing Co. from registering its own “Omaha” trademark.
Intercontinental Exchange Inc. cannot depose the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's general counsel in a trademark suit over CME's risk assessment software because ICE has not proven that the lawyer is the only source of certain information it seeks, an Illinois federal judge ruled Thursday.
Holland & Knight LLP has lured a new partner to its New York office — a tech-focused intellectual property associate from Reed Smith LLP, who defended Google against Oracle’s copyright claims in district court.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has declined to review an Idea Nuova Inc. patent covering the design of a foldable chair, finding that a rival chair maker failed to show how the patent was likely invalid as obvious or anticipated over images on another website.
Emerson Electric Co. asked an Illinois federal judge Tuesday to let it out of a $100 million lawsuit claiming its former subsidiary misappropriated trade secrets that caused a rival’s declined lithium-ion battery sales, saying its status as a former parent company makes liability a “factual impossibility.”
The Seventh Circuit on Wednesday agreed with a lower court that an Indiana lawyer's request for fees in a copyright suit was sanctionable because he did not reveal in his filing that his client had paid to settle the case with prejudice.
Pfizer Inc. on Wednesday announced the launch of a sharply discounted biosimilar version of Amgen Inc.’s Epogen and Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s Procrit, capping hard-fought development efforts marked by approval setbacks and ongoing patent litigation at the Federal Circuit.
Just two weeks in and November is already the year’s busiest month for patent challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, with petitioners seemingly racing to beat a change to the claim construction standard that went into effect Tuesday.
The Federal Circuit has said it wouldn't stay its ruling that sovereign immunity doesn't apply in inter partes reviews while Allergan PLC and the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Verizon subsidiary Oath Holdings Inc. does not have to defend a patent lawsuit over advertisement technology in the Eastern District of New York, the Federal Circuit ruled Wednesday, finding a lower court failed to follow its decision that TC Heartland was a change in the law.
A Delaware federal judge on Wednesday ordered 10X Genomics Inc. to pay nearly $24 million to Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. and the University of Chicago after a jury found that it infringed a droplet-based method of manipulating DNA.
Toymaker MGA Entertainment Inc. must pony up about $1 million in attorneys’ fees in a game patent infringement suit after rival Innovention Toys LLC requested additional fees for a case that went up to the U.S. Supreme Court, a Louisiana federal judge said Tuesday.
The challenges of U.S. patent litigation, combined with increasing levels of comfort with courts in Europe and Asia, are driving companies in high-stakes disputes to increasingly look beyond the U.S. and adopt global enforcement strategies. But it can be daunting to sift through the intricacies of patent litigation around the world. Here, we break down what you need to know about some of the world’s hottest patent venues.
One year ago the U.S. Supreme Court issued a blockbuster ruling on where patent lawsuits can be filed. It was expected to shake up patent litigation in a big way. But did that happen? Here, Law360 takes a look at the impact the case had on the patent landscape.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued two big patent rulings — upholding a system for challenging patents as constitutional, but finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must decide the validity of every challenged claim when it agrees to institute those American Invents Act reviews. Here, Law360 looks at how we got here, what the court ruled, and how these decisions will impact practicing before the PTAB.
Patent attorneys are uniquely positioned to be rainmakers. They should emphasize certain traits — it may sound counterintuitive, but introversion is one of them, says Karen Katz of Suffolk University Law School.
The Second Circuit's decision this month in Universal Church v. Toellner appears to threaten trademark protection routinely afforded to nonprofits and businesses for marks that have established secondary meaning from common or historical terms, says Paul Tarr, head of the appellate practice at Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer LLP.
In this monthly series, Amanda Brady of Major Lindsey & Africa interviews management from top law firms about the increasingly competitive business environment. Here we feature Katie DeBord, chief innovation officer at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP.
The Federal Circuit has explained that patent descriptions do not require any particular form of disclosure. However, the court's recent decision in FWP IP v. Biogen points to a heightened scrutiny of descriptions when an applicant amends or adds new claims to cover a competitor’s activities, say Martin Pavane and Darren Mogil of Cozen O’Connor.
With few cases going to trial, many attorneys keep their oral-presentation skills sharp by teaching continuing legal education programs. To avoid giving a CLE that falls flat and damages your reputation, you must fashion a thoughtful message, control its presentation, and nail the beginning and ending, says Daniel Karon of Karon LLC.
Since the oldest members of Generation Z aren’t even finished with law school yet, law firm management is in a unique position to prepare for their entrance into the legal workforce, says Eliza Stoker of Major Lindsey & Africa.
In AMN Healthcare v. Aya Healthcare Services, a California appellate court recently held that employee nonsolicitation agreements are void unless they fall within one of three statutory exceptions, clearing up uncertainty about their enforceability in the state, say Dylan Wiseman and Alexandra Grayner at Buchalter PC.
Jury verdicts following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2016 Halo decision suggest that previous patent litigation strategies are no longer working for trial-bound cases, say attorneys with Baker Botts LLP.
On Tuesday, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's claim construction standard for America Invents Act post-grant proceedings changes from "broadest reasonable interpretation" to “ordinary and customary meaning.” Attorneys with Faegre Baker Daniels LLP examine this quickly adopted rule and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's response to comments.
In this series featuring law school luminaries, Yale Law School lecturer and Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Linda Greenhouse discusses her coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, the conservatives' long game and trends in journalism.