The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Monday to put restrictions on where patent lawsuits can be filed will limit the ability of patent owners to file cases in favorable courts, likely marking the end of the Eastern District of Texas as a patent litigation hot spot. Here, Law360 takes a look at the impact and other possible fallout from the ruling.
A Delaware federal judge on Thursday shut down Cisco’s efforts to nix a $24 million verdict won by SRI International in the companies’ dispute over network surveillance patents, and instead doubled the damages award and awarded SRI $8 million in attorneys' fees on top.
In its blockbuster ruling this week restricting where patent infringement suits can be filed, the U.S. Supreme Court issued yet another blow to the Federal Circuit in an ongoing battle over whether the court is reading too much into statutes and creating too many elaborate rules for patent law.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s newly confirmed leader said Thursday that the agency will soon take action to ease drug prices by speeding development of generic medicines and cracking down on efforts by brand-name drugmakers to impede competition.
Alphabet Inc. unit Waymo asked a California federal judge Thursday to make Uber hand over a due-diligence report prepared in anticipation of acquiring a self-driving car company started by Anthony Levandowski, an ex-Waymo employee accused of stealing trade secrets, arguing Uber was trying to invoke a work-product privilege to shroud Levandowski's alleged crimes.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has stripped several claims of a patent covering hollow utility poles, finding parts of patent owner Tom W. Waugh’s design are unpatentable based on prior art.
Limelight Networks Inc. is defending its right to walk away from a $40 million IOU to longtime patent rival Akamai, telling the Delaware Supreme Court in a Thursday filing that a judge read requirements into a settlement that were not there.
The company behind the popular “Color Run” races filed a trademark lawsuit Wednesday in California federal court against a group that offers similar paint-drenched runs under the name “My School Color Run.”
Music provider Muzak on Thursday asked the D.C. Circuit to rethink a decision that revived an unusual lawsuit that claims the company is using an obscure grandfather clause to “cheat artists,” saying that the ruling was “demonstrably” incorrect.
Qualcomm Inc. asked a California federal court on Wednesday to force four Apple Inc. product manufacturers to pay royalties on intellectual property licensing agreements while beefing up its counterclaims against the iPhone maker in a separate case, once again alleging Apple has ordered the factories to withhold payments.
Mentor Graphics Corp. has hit back against a Federal Circuit rehearing bid in a patent case over computer emulator technology, telling the appeals court that it already correctly calculated lost profits damages in affirming rival Synopsys Inc. must pay $36 million.
A proposed class of drug wholesalers urged a New York federal judge Wednesday to deny Forest Laboratories LLC’s request for certain documents in an antitrust suit alleging the drugmaker blocked generics for its Namenda Alzheimer’s treatment, saying their profit information is irrelevant in an antitrust case.
Apple Inc. on Wednesday urged the Federal Circuit to keep its decision freeing the California-based technology giant from a $533 million infringement verdict by invalidating Smartflash LLC’s data storage patents, saying the patent holder hadn’t raised anything new in its rehearing bid.
Pfizer asked a Virginia federal judge Wednesday to exclude expert testimony supporting the certification of a class of direct purchasers who allege the drugmaker used fraudulent patents to delay generic-drug competition for its Celebrex painkiller, saying the testimony is not reliable.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has found that all challenged claims in three patents covering customer rewards technology are invalid as obvious or as lacking proper written descriptions, handing retailers including Walgreens a win.
Wal-Mart pushed back on claims that it owes more than $100 million in damages following a ruling that it “deliberately” infringed the trademarks of a small Southern discount chain, saying Wednesday the smaller rival is seeking a “windfall.”
Trade group representatives and patent attorneys on Thursday warned of the further “erosion” of the U.S. patent system should the U.S. Supreme Court decline to review what they deem a slapdash ruling from the Federal Circuit reinstating Apple’s $120 million smartphone verdict against Samsung.
A Sixth Circuit panel on Wednesday said a lower court properly ruled in favor of Stryker Corp. when a jury found a former salesman for the company violated noncompete and confidentiality agreements and misappropriated trade secrets, saying the court correctly applied Michigan rather than Louisiana law.
President Donald Trump’s pick for intellectual property enforcement coordinator encountered relatively smooth sailing during his confirmation hearing Wednesday, stressing the importance of a well-oiled patent system while reserving judgment on the U.S. Supreme Court's recent TC Heartland decision.
A Florida federal judge on Tuesday issued an injunction against a former baggage handling company employee as part of a settlement agreement ending allegations that he sent the company's trade secrets to Delta Air Lines Inc. during contract negotiations.
The University of California and pharmaceutical maker Medivation told a San Francisco jury Wednesday that they had settled the school’s drug patent licensing suit on the eve of trial, thanking jurors and telling them the jury selection process had helped usher in the deal.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday put tighter restrictions on where patent owners can file infringement lawsuits, a decision that upends nearly 30 years of established practice and will likely force many lawsuits out of the patent litigation hotbed of the Eastern District of Texas. Here, check out all of our best coverage of the case.
In the second installment of this two-part series on disruptive innovation among mid-size law firms, Jill Dessalines, founder of Strategic Advice for Successful Lawyers and former senior vice president at McKesson Corp., explores a number of ideas for keeping clients and maintaining market position.
While Delaware will certainly see its patent docket swell post-TC Heartland, another state that is likely to see an uptick is Georgia. Because the Northern District of Georgia will be new to a number of lawyers, Coby Nixon and Seth Trimble of Taylor English Duma LLP share some tips based on their experience as local and lead counsel on patent infringement matters within the district.
At a time when the U.S. is pulling back on the patentability of software inventions, China is moving in the opposite direction. Recent changes to Chinese guidelines expanded patentability of business method patents and enhanced claiming options for patents covering software inventions, says Elizabeth Chien-Hale of Brinks Gilson & Lione.
As I sat there listening, incredulous to learn that "Milkshake" was not only a real song but also a chart-topper, it reminded me of Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen’s work on disruptive innovation — and how it pertains to mid-size law firms, says Jill Dessalines, founder of Strategic Advice for Successful Lawyers and former assistant general counsel of McKesson Corp.
The U.S. Supreme Court's TC Heartland decision this week will likely lead to more patent litigation filings in Delaware, which will lead to more patent litigators following the bedrock principles required of every attorney who practices in the District of Delaware — a level of professionalism we call "The Delaware Way," says Denise Kraft of DLA Piper LLP.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently released America Invents Act trial statistics through the first half of fiscal year 2017, and one trend is clear: The overall trial institution rates for inter partes reviews, covered business method reviews and post-grant reviews are down, say Kerry Taylor and Nathanael Luman of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP.
For nearly 30 years, courts have liberally construed the patent venue statute. But no more — on Monday the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated its 1957 Fourco interpretation of the statute. This decision in TC Heartland will have a profound and immediate impact on patent litigation, say Brian Ferguson and Rahul Arora of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP.
With recent developments in the gaming world, game developers, professional gamers and other players in the virtual reality and esports space should be mindful of how to protect their own intellectual property rights while not infringing on the rights of others, say Eric Ball and Kunyu Ching of Fenwick & West LLP.
Every lawyer who’s handled a civil case in federal court knows about Rule 30(b)(6), governing deposition procedures. But for many real-world deposition dilemmas, the rule offers little guidance. Last year, an Advisory Committee on Civil Rules subcommittee began considering whether the rule should be amended. Now attorneys must advise the subcommittee how to proceed, says Frank Silvestri Jr. of Verrill Dana LLP.
Even though the U.S. Supreme Court has all but eliminated the defense of laches in copyright and patent infringement actions, laches likely remains viable against allegations of trademark infringement, say Howard Hogan and Anthony Vita of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.