Everything You Need To Know About Arthrex

By Dani Kass (January 9, 2020, 6:28 PM EST) -- At the end of October, a Federal Circuit panel said the way Patent Trial and Appeal Board judges are appointed is unconstitutional, and solved the problem by removing tenure protections. Since then, each aspect of the ruling from Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew has been under scrutiny. 

Here, Law360 breaks down what you need to know about the case and its aftermath. 

Remind me, what happened in Arthrex?

The explosive decision stemmed from a standard inter partes review. In November 2016, Smith & Nephew Inc. asked the PTAB to review an Arthrex Inc. suture patent. The board agreed to do so, and...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!