Analysis

The Impact Of Distinct Printed Publication Rules In Exams, IPR

Law360 (April 13, 2020, 10:15 PM EDT) -- Recent precedential decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board setting different standards for when printed publications can invalidate patents in inter partes review and prosecution are a blow to patent applicants and could alter strategies for challenging patents, attorneys say.

The board set precedent in December that patent challengers in inter partes review must present specific evidence to show that a document was publicly accessible before a patent application and can thus be used as prior art to challenge the patent. But it said in a separate decision last week that patent examiners don't have to clear that high a...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!