False Marking Constitutionality Debate To Rage On

By Allison Grande (February 24, 2011, 9:12 PM EST) -- An Ohio district court's finding that the qui tam provision of the false marking statute is unconstitutional may give a boost to companies targeted in suits over allegedly expired patents, but a widespread and lasting impact on the recent rash of case filings is unlikely to occur until the Federal Circuit inevitably weighs in on the issue, attorneys say....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Read the full article

Already a subscriber? Click here to login