Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

How Gunn V. Minton Will Impact Patent Malpractice Cases

Law360, New York (February 22, 2013, 5:07 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court has determined in a unanimous decision that federal courts do not have jurisdiction to hear a legal malpractice claim simply because the underlying action was one for patent infringement. Applying the test it articulated in Grable, the Supreme Court determined that patent malpractice cases do not present "a substantial federal issue." The court explained that the substantiality requirement is focused on the impact that the malpractice case has on the federal system as a whole. Since patent malpractice actions typically involve a hypothetical "case within a case" scenario, the court reasoned, the outcome does not have a substantial effect on the federal system....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!