A Powerful Tool For Challenging Business Method Patents
Law360, New York (July 3, 2014, 10:32 AM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank has garnered significant attention, but ultimately did little more than confirm what was apparent since the court’s Bilski opinion four years ago, namely that some method claims — especially business method claims — are subject to substantial attack under §101 if the claimed steps are performable by a human and are not meaningfully coupled to a tangible device other than a general-purpose computer.
The Alice patents included method claims directed to facilitating the exchange of financial obligations between two parties. The claims recited specific steps for mitigating “settlement risk”...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!