Understanding Alice: Step 1 Of Mayo Analysis At PTAB
Law360, New York (October 17, 2014, 10:27 AM EDT) -- While the United States Patent and Trademark Office and patent practitioners continue to grapple with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice v. CLS Bank decision, last month two panels of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued decisions in covered business method patent reviews that illustrate very different approaches to the Section 101 inquiry. Four months after Alice, and two years after Mayo — the decision that announced the new two-step inquiry applicable to all three judicial exclusions — the application of the abstract ideas doctrine remains elusive.
A major challenge is that the first prong of the Mayo inquiry (i.e., “Is the claim...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!