Lawyers Weigh In On High Court Claim Construction Ruling
Law360, New York (January 20, 2015, 6:02 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday cast aside the Federal Circuit's long-standing rule that all district court claim construction rulings must be reviewed anew on appeal. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz is significant.
Bill Atkins, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
“The Teva decision is a ground shift, but not a true earthquake. The district court has now been given deference on factual issues while much of claim construction remains a matter of law. Markman proceedings just became even more important and more expensive, as the strategic question will be whether to use an expert...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!