Teva May Impact Strategy For PTAB Trials And Appeals

Law360, New York (February 13, 2015, 9:16 AM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that the Federal Circuit must apply a "clear error" standard of review, not de novo, when reviewing a district court's subsidiary factual findings related to claim construction. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., 135 S.Ct. 831 (2015). Now, for example, when a district court resolves a dispute between experts and makes findings about technical issues relevant to understanding a claim term, the Federal Circuit should not disturb those findings on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!