Choosing The Best Post-Grant Proceeding For Your Case

Law360, New York (October 19, 2015, 10:36 AM EDT) -- The America Invents Act, which went into effect on Sept. 16, 2012, created three post-grant review proceedings: post-grant review, inter partes review and covered business method review. While much of the focus during the last three years has centered on IPR proceedings, it is important for practitioners to know the differences between all three proceedings and the issues to consider in determining whether it makes sense to incorporate one or more of these proceedings into your patent defense strategy. This article provides an overview of key considerations for determining which type of post-grant proceeding is best suited for your case....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!