Lessons From 2 Successful CBM Reviews

Law360, New York (March 10, 2016, 10:39 AM EST) -- The implementation of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act 35 U.S.C. §§ 321 and 18 has resulted in a significant increase in the filing of petitions challenging patent validity. When compared to district court litigation, post-grant proceedings provide a more predictable and cost-effective alternative for challenging issued patents. Post-grant proceedings include the following: inter partes review, covered business method and post-grant review. This article will focus on the impact of recent case law on CBMs and lessons learned through the petitions....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!