Amicus Brief Claims Bilski Test May Hurt Innovation

By Erin Coe (March 5, 2009, 12:00 AM EST) -- The chief concern about the test laid out in the In re: Bilski decision is not that it is overly restrictive of the business methods that are patentable, but that the test is inherently vague and likely to create uncertainty that will harm innovation, according to an amicus brief filed this week with the U.S. Supreme Court....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!