Using High Court's Failure To Define 'Component' In Promega

By Junqi Hang, Law Firm of Dr. Junqi Hang PLC (May 16, 2017, 12:26 PM EDT) -- Promega[1] states that "a single component does not constitute a substantial portion of the components" under § 271(f)(1). However, Promega does not state what constitutes such a component. This article analyzes how Promega's silence on § 271(f)(1)'s component offers an opportunity to survive a § 271(f)(1) challenge....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!