We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Opinions Of Counsel After TC Heartland

Law360, New York (July 13, 2017, 12:21 PM EDT) -- Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Halo Electronics Inc. v. Pulse Electronics Inc.[1] and TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC,[2] opinions of counsel regarding patent infringement and validity, in the face of an assertion of infringement were often eschewed as unnecessary or impractical. On the one hand, opinions of counsel could be used as evidence of willful infringement, and potentially raised questions with respect to attorney-client privilege and work product privilege if used defensively. On the other hand, patent owners...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.