Advances in artificial intelligence raise intriguing patent law questions, including whether AI breakthroughs are patent-eligible and whether AI that creates something can be an "inventor" entitled to a patent. Here's a look at issues attorneys say patent law will soon need to confront in this burgeoning field.
A Dallas-area industrial construction company has alleged in Texas state court that a former project manager fed confidential information about pricing for a petrochemical facility job to a subcontractor that stole the client and poached the crew.
Weeks after the Ninth Circuit revived a copyright lawsuit over Led Zeppelin’s "Stairway to Heaven," Ed Sheeran is battling with the heirs of a late songwriter over what the ruling means for their separate case over Marvin Gaye’s iconic "Let's Get It On."
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has found a patent covering a TV programming guide to be invalid, delivering a win to Comcast Cable Communications LLC in its wide-ranging intellectual property dispute with a TiVo Corp. subsidiary.
Thirteen litigators have left McKool Smith to form Reichman Jorgensen LLP, a new trial boutique with offices in New York, Silicon Valley and Atlanta, leaving behind not only their previous law firm but also the billable hour as the new firm operates solely on an alternative fee basis, the firm announced Monday.
The owner of Wikipedia is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a copyright ruling against a television search engine called TVEyes, warning that the decision would let rights owners such as Fox News "stifle criticism."
The Federal Circuit will soon discontinue its practice of “tendering” briefs and make all briefs publicly available the moment they are submitted on the docket, the court has announced.
Qualcomm has asked the Ninth Circuit to review the certification of a class estimated to cover 250 million cellphone buyers who allegedly paid overages stemming from the chipmaker's anti-competitive licensing practices, saying the ruling creates "quite likely the biggest class action in history."
A pharmaceutical inventor and entrepreneur was hit with a derivative lawsuit on Friday in Delaware Chancery Court by his former wife over ownership of a patent that she claims he is improperly trying to license to a pharmaceutical company.
The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday it would not review a case against Comcast and Verizon over media streaming patents, leaving in place a ruling that found the patents were invalid for claiming nothing more than an abstract idea.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has upheld two X One Inc. patents on location tracking technology, with the board finding that the claims challenged by Uber Technologies Inc. were not obvious in light of prior art.
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. sought an injunction in Pennsylvania state court Monday to stop competitor Siemens Mobility Inc. from having access to its technology through a shared client, CSX Transportation, for whom both companies are developing an automated system for signaling and controlling trains.
The U.S. International Trade Commission has banned Toshiba Corp. from importing certain memory devices that rip off Taiwan-based Macronix International Co. Ltd.’s patented semiconductor technology, reversing an earlier finding by an administrative law judge that the Japanese electronics giant’s imports did not violate tariff laws, according to a Monday notice in the Federal Register.
French ministers agreed to cut taxes on corporate patent income to 10 percent Monday as part of a wider overhaul to align the country’s research incentives with global norms.
While women have made significant inroads into the elite world of U.S. Supreme Court advocacy, last term the number of women arguing at the court hit a decade low. Was it an off year? Or a sign of progress stalled? (This article is the first in a series examining the gender gap among high court advocates.)
In exclusive on-camera interviews with Law360, the most prolific female U.S. Supreme Court advocate of the past decade and a first-timer reflect on the status of women in a field still dominated by men. (This article is part of a series examining the gender gap among high court advocates.)
A New York-based flag football league called foul on a rival league in a Florida federal court Thursday, seeking unspecified damages on allegations that the rival has been claiming the New York league’s events and demographics as its own to win sponsors for an Orlando tournament.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board on Thursday gave a partial win to Stingray Digital Group Inc. in its bitter patent fight with rival music channel provider Music Choice, finding that part of a Music Choice patent for on-demand entertainment systems is invalid as obvious.
Merck & Co. Inc. and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc. have asked a Virginia federal court to throw out three complaints in multidistrict litigation accusing them of entering into an illegal reverse-payment deal to keep a generic version of the cholesterol drug Zetia off the market.
A Hewlett Packard Malaysia manager was merely "cheerleading" when she described possible future work to a startup that now claims it was duped into providing tens of millions of dollars in free services and software, HP's attorney argued Friday at the close of a California federal trial.
A member of China's intelligence agency pled not guilty Friday to charges he attempted to gather trade secrets from jet engine manufacturer GE Aviation, but an Ohio federal judge said he should remain in prison until trial, citing inconsistent accounts about his employment.
The challenges of U.S. patent litigation, combined with increasing levels of comfort with courts in Europe and Asia, are driving companies in high-stakes disputes to increasingly look beyond the U.S. and adopt global enforcement strategies. But it can be daunting to sift through the intricacies of patent litigation around the world. Here, we break down what you need to know about some of the world’s hottest patent venues.
One year ago the U.S. Supreme Court issued a blockbuster ruling on where patent lawsuits can be filed. It was expected to shake up patent litigation in a big way. But did that happen? Here, Law360 takes a look at the impact the case had on the patent landscape.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued two big patent rulings — upholding a system for challenging patents as constitutional, but finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must decide the validity of every challenged claim when it agrees to institute those American Invents Act reviews. Here, Law360 looks at how we got here, what the court ruled, and how these decisions will impact practicing before the PTAB.
In the aftermath of Justice Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation, the U.S. Supreme Court should decline review of the nation's most polarizing political questions unless and until the questions become time-sensitive, says Alexander Klein, head of the commercial litigation group at Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco LLP.
In this series featuring law school luminaries, Boston College Law School professor Kent Greenfield reflects on his corporate law theories, his legal battle with the Pentagon over free speech and gay rights, and important constitutional law issues to watch out for.
As highlighted in the Federal Circuit's recent decision in Texas Advanced v. Renesas, plaintiffs hoping to assert trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement claims in the same lawsuit must craft damage theories carefully to avoid running afoul of the prohibition against double recovery, say attorneys at Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP.
Whether Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s prior statements may be grounds for disqualification when it comes to judging certain cases is debatable, but there are no specific recusal guidelines for the U.S. Supreme Court. The justices themselves don’t even agree on where to draw the line when it comes to perceived political bias, says Donald Scarinci, a founding partner of Scarinci Hollenbeck LLC.
As technology evolves, law firms are increasingly looking for ways to improve communication, transparency and service for their clients. Firms should put knowledge management at the core of their value proposition to create a competitive advantage, says Rob MacAdam at HighQ.
Last week, Canada reached agreement with the United States and Mexico on what is essentially a revised North American Free Trade Agreement. The new U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement alters some provisions of NAFTA, maintains others and borrows a few ideas from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, say attorneys with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.
Under New York law, statements made in court and other litigation-related communications are, in most cases, privileged. But these privileges have limits, and it behooves litigants — particularly those inclined to speak publicly about their cases — to be aware of them, says Jonathan Bloom of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office eligibility rules for design patent prosecutors are irrational, costly and biased against women’s access to a valuable part of the legal profession. A number of different approaches are available to solve the problem, say Christopher Buccafusco and Jeanne Curtis of the Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University.
To predict the kinds of questions early Defend Trade Secrets Act appellate decisions may resolve, Gregory Lantier and Thomas Sprankling of WilmerHale consider how courts have interpreted other intellectual property statutes.
As we watch what passes for political discourse in our nation’s capital, it’s understandable that universities are launching programs on how to cope with ideological disputes. But our country needs fewer people who profess to be open-minded and more people who engage in and honor the conclusions of reasoned debates, says Alex Dimitrief of General Electric Co.