Almost two-thirds of Europe's patent infringement cases are lodged in Germany, where the losing side has to pay and injunctions are granted as of right, the first stop on Law360's look at prominent patent jurisdictions around the globe.
Electric vehicle startup EVelozcity sued Faraday & Future on Thursday in California state court, calling a contract term its competitor imposes to prevent departing employees from encouraging colleagues to also leave for another company “illegally restrictive.”
The Eleventh Circuit on Thursday ruled that Aspen Specialty Insurance Co. does not have to cover a Florida condominium group’s costs to defend a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by the owner of an Alaska hotel, agreeing with a lower court that a policy exclusion for intellectual property claims bars coverage.
Law360's tour of prominent patent jurisdictions around the globe focuses this week on China, where patent applications and infringement actions in specialized courts are booming, but a lack of discovery and political concerns might give pause to some foreign litigants.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Wednesday proposed increasing the fee to challenge patents in America Invents Act reviews by about 25 percent beginning in 2021, citing additional work for the office created by the U.S. Supreme Court's recent SAS Institute decision.
An audio device maker has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to consider whether patent claims canceled in America Invents Act reviews are regulatory takings by the government, such that patent owners are owed compensation on constitutional grounds, particularly those whose patents were filed or issued before 2011.
A California federal judge has awarded StubHub a win over allegations it flouted the Defend Trade Secrets Act when it hired three employees from a startup company who allegedly used proprietary data from their former company in apps they developed for the online ticket vendor.
Jaguar Land Rover Ltd. has abandoned its trademark on the “Defender” name because it hasn’t sold one in the United States since 1998, Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. argued in legal papers filed in Michigan federal court defending its counterclaims to the former’s patent infringement suit.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has ruled that consumers would confuse a craft brewer’s “Mastermind” beer brand with an already-registered “Mastermind Vodka” trademark.
A California federal judge issued a findings of fact order that favored Ugg maker Deckers Outdoor Corp. following a $5.2 million verdict that held Romeo and Juliette Inc. liable for infringing two design patents.
A Louisiana federal judge on Thursday kept alive the majority of the City of New Orleans’ claims against the operator of the city's historic St. Roch Market food hall in a fight over the rights to the market’s trademark, with a trademark dilution claim the only one to get the ax.
A federal judge in Delaware said he is inclined to stand pat on most of the jury verdicts and rulings that produced an $82.5 million award in late July against Groupon Inc. for infringing four early, e-commerce-related IBM Corp. patents.
Wireless networking company Ubiquiti Networks Inc. hit rival Cambium Networks Inc. with copyright infringement, fraud and antitrust claims in Illinois federal court over allegations Cambium is selling firmware that hacks Ubiquiti's devices and uses them as a launching point for its wireless service.
The vice president of an airline marketing company urged an Illinois federal court to quash a subpoena into his immigration records that was issued by a Canadian budget airline in a contract and intellectual property dispute between the two companies.
The wife of the late N.W.A. member Eazy-E and his son have agreed to settle a lawsuit in California federal court over the use of “Straight Outta Compton” and other phrases associated with the rap group.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidated as obvious an on-screen TV programming guide patent held by a TiVo Corp. subsidiary, handing a victory to Comcast Corp. in a wide-ranging intellectual property war between the two entertainment companies.
Jones Day has grabbed a “first chair litigator” in Silicon Valley from Paul Hastings LLP with nearly 20 years of experience in patent and technology work, the firm announced Monday.
Mobile navigation app patent holder Vehicle IP LLC urged a Federal Circuit panel Wednesday to revive its infringement claims against a Verizon Wireless affiliate, saying a lower court, for a second time, improperly inserted restrictive language into its claim construction when it axed the suit.
Bombardier and Arctic Cat each lost bids for a new trial in a snowmobile patent dispute when a Minnesota federal judge ruled Tuesday that there was sufficient evidence supporting a jury’s finding that Arctic Cat infringed one of Bombardier’s patents, and that the contested claims in two patents were invalid.
The Philadelphia office of Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP says it has added a powerful intellectual property team that includes a pair of LGBT “trailblazers” with four hires from Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC.
The Federal Circuit on Wednesday affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to invalidate several claims in a patent covering Alcon Laboratories' Durezol eye drops, shooting down an appeal from two Japanese drugmakers that were hoping to keep a generic version of the medication off the market.
One year ago the U.S. Supreme Court issued a blockbuster ruling on where patent lawsuits can be filed. It was expected to shake up patent litigation in a big way. But did that happen? Here, Law360 takes a look at the impact the case had on the patent landscape.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued two big patent rulings — upholding a system for challenging patents as constitutional, but finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must decide the validity of every challenged claim when it agrees to institute those American Invents Act reviews. Here, Law360 looks at how we got here, what the court ruled, and how these decisions will impact practicing before the PTAB.
After a three-year surge, patent suits at the Federal Circuit leveled off last year as the court showed signs of adjusting to its bustling workload. The judges found time to write more opinions, and they reached greater consensus, penning fewer separate concurrences and dissents than in 2016.
People with certain personality traits tend to use certain words. A computer analysis of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s D.C. Circuit opinions reveals that he is highly extraverted, which means that he would be a prominent voice on the U.S. Supreme Court, says Matthew Hall, a professor at the University of Notre Dame.
Two recent copyright decisions reflect a challenge for companies seeking to protect their software — courts' highly nuanced examinations of the functionality and structure of the software at issue in determining whether copyright protection is warranted, says Mark Moore of Reavis Page Jump LLP.
The Delaware Chancery Court's recent decision in Alarm.com v. ABS highlights the tension an emerging company often faces with its potential outside investors over its trade secrets, say Josh Fowkes and Brandi Howard of Arent Fox LLP.
An educated guess puts the number of new litigation funders launched in the past 18 months at 30 — an astonishing number, with more to come. Is this a blessing to our legal system or something more akin to tulip mania? Maybe both, says Ralph Sutton, founder and CEO of litigation funding firm Validity Finance LLC.
Notwithstanding well-settled precedent, the Federal Circuit in Praxair v. Mallinckrodt expressly equated printed matter limitations lacking patentable weight with patent-ineligible subject matter, says Paul Zagar of Leason Ellis LLP.
As new communications platforms displace email, the legal industry is awkwardly grappling with complex e-discovery questions. Fortunately, this environment provides a very fertile ground of incentives for innovation in both e-discovery technology and service offerings, says Thomas Bonk of Epiq.
What are U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh's views on intellectual property? He has not been presented with a lot of IP-specific issues, but a few D.C. Circuit cases give some clues as to his thinking, says Van Lindberg of Dykema Gossett PLLC.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's proposed rule changing claim construction in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is likely to be adopted in some form. In view of the 300 comments submitted over the last two months, we have a few predictions and some questions, say attorneys with Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
Notwithstanding the latest salary war among prominent law firms, I urge my middle-aged and older colleagues to help the recent graduates we know focus on the long term. Even if the salary is the same, there is a big difference between an institutional firm and the relatively younger firms matching BigLaw, says J.B. Heaton, a University of Chicago business law fellow and former partner at Bartlit Beck.
The analysis underlying the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in WesternGeco v. Ion opens the door to arguments for reasonable royalty damages based on foreign activities arising from domestic infringement, say attorneys with Robins Kaplan LLP.