Bud Light used an actor dressed as a medieval town crier last week to ask a Minnesota brewery to stop using the company’s trademarks, becoming the latest brand to transform a cease-and-desist into a marketing stunt.
A company specializing in sex selection technology for semen used in artificial insemination of animals on Tuesday sought to resurrect portions of patents for sorting and freezing bovine semen for transport, telling a Federal Circuit panel that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board improperly struck down challenged aspects of the patents as obvious.
Texas Roadhouse Inc. and Texas Corral Restaurants Inc. have agreed to end Roadhouse's trademark infringement suit over a logo featuring a map of the state of Texas wearing a cowboy hat, according to documents filed in Indiana federal court Tuesday, with both parties agreeing to bear their own costs.
An increase in the number of motions to amend challenged patents is likely following the recent issuance of new guidance lowering the burden on such claims Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC's Patrick C. Keane predicted Monday.
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. and three of its recent hires pushed a Massachusetts federal court Monday to toss or send elsewhere a lawsuit in which competitor Shire Pharmaceuticals LLC accuses them of breaching employment agreements and stealing confidential customer information.
The Federal Circuit declined on Tuesday to reconsider its decision invalidating a resealable cookie container that a Kraft unit accused Kellogg of infringing, standing by its affirmation of a lower court’s finding that Kraft’s evidence of commercial success and industry praise could not overcome Kellogg’s strong case that the patent is obvious.
Securus Technologies and Global Tel*Link have reached a confidential settlement to end their long-running infringement dispute over patents used in prison phone systems, according to a joint motion for dismissal filed Monday in Texas federal court.
A class of end purchasers accusing Allergan PLC and its subsidiary Warner Chilcott Ltd. of stifling competition for their ulcerative colitis drugs urged a Massachusetts federal court Monday not to certify a causation issue, saying they’ve adequately argued that the companies’ alleged wrongdoing caused them harm.
Crocs Inc. asked a Nevada federal judge for sanctions on Monday against a Canadian footwear company, including an apology, arguing that this is the third time it has improperly sued Crocs to obtain litigation leverage in separate proceedings and a “free pass” for disparaging media coverage.
A Texas federal magistrate judge has awarded a print company attorneys’ fees and expenses after a patent holder “unreasonably” continued to litigate an infringement suit in an attempt to avoid having to cover such costs.
Hytera Communications Corp. leveled a lawsuit against Motorola Solutions in New Jersey federal court on Monday alleging the telecommunications giant has unlawfully monopolized the land mobile radios market by using “carrot and stick” tactics to pressure dealers not to carry competitors’ products and “sham litigation” to ruin Hytera’s reputation.
A New Zealand health food company urged a Ninth Circuit panel Monday to revive its suit accusing Whole Foods of infringing its “Eatright” trademark, saying it didn’t unreasonably wait before suing, and even if it had, the grocer hadn’t made significant investments in the phrase during the alleged delay.
Allergan’s plan to defeat inter partes reviews of patents on its eye drug Restasis by transferring them to a Native American tribe prompted over a dozen dueling amicus briefs Friday, with tech giants and generics makers decrying the deal as a “sham” and other tribes stoutly defending it.
Kaz USA Inc. urged a Federal Circuit panel Monday to upend Exergen Corp.’s $14.6 million patent infringement win against the company, arguing a district court judge shouldn’t have decided forehead thermometer patent issues properly left to the jury.
A California federal judge wants to know whether Uber should have given Waymo an ex-employee’s letter alleging a corporate culture of secrecy, saying at a hearing Monday he’d have to tell the jury in the hotly anticipated trial over self-driving car trade secrets if there were attempts to “hide the ball” during discovery.
Garmin International Inc. can’t collect attorneys’ fees after the owner of two patents on a product customization system dropped an infringement suit, according to a Texas federal court ruling on Friday that found the litigious patent owner hadn’t obviously filed the suit for extortion purposes.
Celltrion Inc. shouldn’t be allowed to appeal a Massachusetts federal court’s decision not to dismiss Janssen Biotech Inc.’s patent lawsuit over Pfizer Inc.’s biosimilar of anti-inflammatory biologic Remicade, Janssen said Monday, arguing there was nothing extraordinary about the ruling and that an appeal now would only delay the case.
Microsoft Corp. told a Virginia federal court Friday that patent infringement litigation brought by the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe and Texas-based computer company SRC Labs LLC should be sent to Washington state, where the alleged wrongdoing took place, arguing the suit isn’t sufficiently connected to Virginia.
A company claiming that the Chicago transit system’s touchless payment system violates its patents on Friday asked the full Federal Circuit to reconsider a panel decision invalidating four of its patents as abstract, arguing that the court should clarify the abstractness standard under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice ruling.
A patent licensing company appeared to struggle Monday to convince a Federal Circuit panel to uphold its media search patents in Google’s challenge to a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision against the technology giant.
The U.S. Supreme Court opted Monday not to hear Dow AgroSciences LLC’s bid to overturn a $455 million arbitral award issued to two Bayer AG subsidiaries over infringement of weed control patents, ending a yearslong dispute over a gene for herbicide resistance.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday put tighter restrictions on where patent owners can file infringement lawsuits, a decision that upends nearly 30 years of established practice and will likely force many lawsuits out of the patent litigation hotbed of the Eastern District of Texas. Here, check out all of our best coverage of the case.
Remote video appearance is already in use for certain trials, hearings, and arbitration and mediation proceedings. But the methodology of court remoteness and the concept of "smart" courts may not be able to accommodate intellectual property cases, which tend to be complex in subject matter, say Junqi Hang and Jingqiang Zhang of Dragon Intellectual Property Law Firm.
In a March Law360 article, we explained that many district courts were limiting inter partes review estoppel to only the instituted grounds resulting in a final written decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which was problematic. Since then, however, the district courts have reached a new consensus toward a broader application of estoppel, say Jon Gurka and James Smith of Knobbe Martens.
Nothing has been more instrumental in my role as a legal recruiter than what I learned from a variety of hedge fund managers, venture capitalists and investment bankers — how to analyze a deal and make a decision quickly. It boils down to the traditional SWOT analysis, says Howard Cohl, director in Major Lindsey & Africa’s emerging markets group.
How do the unknown, but inherent, characteristics of prior art factor into an obviousness analysis? I propose a simple framework for unraveling inherency issues that arise in the context of obviousness, says William Carroll of Michael Best & Friedrich LLP.
As law firms begin preparing for their annual budget review, Steve Falkin and Lee Garbowitz of HBR Consulting discuss why firm leaders should give their internal information technology and procurement teams a seat at the table.
When the U.S. Supreme Court decided the now-famous TC Heartland case in May 2017, a robust discussion began regarding how significant its effects would be. Chase Perry of Ankura examined statistics from recent months in search of changes in case filing patterns and patent holder success metrics.
Shortly after I interviewed him last year, former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader publicly expressed interest in becoming director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Although he did not ultimately get chosen for the position, the interview provides insights into how the Trump administration can take the patent system in a new direction, says Eli Mazour of Harrity & Harrity LLP.
Artificial intelligence needs to be legally defensible in order to be useful to law firms. There are requirements for making this happen, says Mark Williamson, co-founder and chief technology officer of Hanzo Archives Ltd.
The long litigation life cycle for large, complex civil lawsuits provides ample time for clients and counsel to form strong opinions — often negative when based on adversarial exchanges — about the opposing trial team, their witnesses and their experts. Martha Luring of Salmons Consulting shares some common perceptions not always shared by jurors.
The U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to reverse a recent Eleventh Circuit decision and settle a disagreement over the copyright registration requirement for lawsuits alleging infringement. While circuit splits are relatively rare in copyright law, this divide is deepening, says Alexander Kaplan of Proskauer Rose LLP.